Students and environmentalists have condemned Sydney University for its $900,000 (£504,000) investment in a controversial coal mine.
According to Greenpeace, the leading Australian university has confirmed that 0.1% of its investment fund has been channeled into shares in Whitehaven Coal, the company behind the $767 million (£430m) Maules Creek mine.
Construction at Maules Creek started in January 2014, and the mine is now said to be more than half finished. Operations are expected to begin in March 2015.
Critics of the project are concerned about its potential environmental impact. Its development will require the destruction of much of the ancient Leard State Forest, which is home to many endangered species.
Environmentalists also say the mine will emit approximately 30 million tonnes of carbon per year. This means that over its 30-year lifetime it will emit twice as much carbon as the Australian government plans to save with its climate change action plan.
With this in mind, campaigners have urged the university to ditch its holdings in Whitehaven.
“A university like Sydney University promotes itself as green and ethical,” said Greenpeace spokesman Nikola Casule.
“They generally promote a green image so for them to live up to that, today we’re calling on the vice chancellor, Michael Spence, to sell all shares in this coal company.”
In a statement, the university insisted that its investment portfolio “is under constant review to ensure our social, environmental and governance responsibilities are balanced with our responsibilities to students, staff and donors.”
The growing fossil fuel divestment movement has enjoyed particular success amongst universities, thanks to student participation and universities’ positions as moral leaders.
London University’s School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) temporarily froze its investment in fossil fuel companies in July, pledging to consider full divestment.
Campaigners have urged universities and other shareholders to divest from coal, oil and gas firms not just because of their environmental impacts, but also the financial risks they may incur.
Some experts say that if policies were introduced to ensure that the majority of fossil fuel reserves stay buried, the assets of fossil fuel firms would be severely devalued – leaving them as ‘stranded assets’.
One recent study estimated that the world’s biggest 20 oil projects are putting $91 billion (£54bn) of investors’ money at risk as a result of this.
Photo: Leard State Forest via Flickr
Like our Facebook Page
7 Benefits of Purchasing Sustainable Housing
Our Top Five Sustainable Home Renovations For 2023
6 Ways Eco-Friendly Photographers Can Take Beautiful Natural Pictures
Emerging Research In Seagrass Restoration: What Does The Future Hold?
Sustainable Bites: How To Make Your Diet Eco-Friendly
Coffee Farms & Cloud Forests: Colombia’s New Eco Initiatives
Electric Cars: Are They Worth The Switch?
Maximizing the Efficiency of Deliveries: Strategies for Sustainable Businesses
The Rise of Sustainable Cloud Computing
Navigating Towards A Greener Future: Sustainable Practices In Maritime
The Future of Sustainability In The Logistics Industry
Can Eco-Friendly Businesses Embrace VPNs to Bolster Cybersecurity?
Eight Different Eco-Friendly Developments in the Food Industry
UK Lags EU in Installing Heat Pumps to Slow Climate Change
5 Key Areas to Look at When It Comes to Business Sustainability
Addressing Leadership Challenges in Green Entrepreneurship
Holding Eco-Friendly Coins is Greener and More Profitable
5 Reasons That Diamonds Can Be Excellent Green Investments
Eco-Friendly Airlines Use Weather Models to Make Safer Flights
Why Should We Invest in Eco-Friendly Homes?
- Features3 months ago
What is the Eco-Friendliest Option to Wash Your Dishes?
- Environment7 months ago
6 Home Improvements You Can Make to Help the Environment
- Environment11 months ago
How to Ensure Your Home’s Eco-Friendly During Construction?
- Business10 months ago
The Pulp & Paper Industry is Reaching its Sustainability Goals