Privacy settings

Choose whether optional services may connect to their providers. Your choice is stored on this device for up to 180 days. You can change or withdraw it here anytime.

When an optional service is enabled, its provider may receive your IP address and browser information. Read the full privacy and cookie notice and contact details before choosing. Read privacy and cookies · Contact

Ethical investment & sustainable living · since 2010 Sunday 15 November 2026
Ethical Investment and Sustainable Living The Brief

Search Blue & Green Tomorrow

Saved stories

0
Loading saved stories...

Follow Us

News
Desk position: News, centre

More than half at EU Food Safety Authority have ‘conflict of interest’

The News desk

Almost 60% of food experts at the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) have some kind of link with the companies that they are tasked with regulating, according to a new report.

The investigation, by the Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) and freelance journalist Stéphane Horel, says there are “major loopholes in EFSA’s independence policy”, given that a large number of its experts have connections – such as consultancy contracts or research funding – with the agencies that they investigate.

The report, called Unhappy Meal: The European Food Safety Authority’s independence problem, argues that the body in charge of EU food safety has failed to apply new rules to the assessment of its experts, missing wider conflicts of interests in the panels.

Main author Stéphane Horel said, “We were shocked by our findings. Even without checking for undeclared interests, the number of conflicts of interest in this agency is very worrying. Experts with conflicts of interest dominate all panels but one.”

EFSA deals with issues concerning food additives, labelling, packaging, GMOs and pesticides. It was involved in the assessment of the horsemeat scandal and analysed the threat posed by pesticides to pollinator insects.

Martin Pigeon, researcher and campaigner at CEO, added, “Despite indications of a new willingness to tackle the problem, EFSA seems not to have learnt from its previous mistakes

“EFSA is also paying the price of EU and national research policy flaws but it should not use this as an excuse to allow such a situation to persist. It must defend the public interest.

“We hope this report is an eye-opener on the necessity to defend public research integrity from the threats posed on public health by industry influence.”

Further reading:

Bee protection ‘essential’ after scientists link decline in numbers with insecticides

Chemical giants did ‘furious lobbying against EU measures to save bees’

Kansas geophysicist accused of vested interests after tabling anti-sustainability bill

Fracking bosses in Whitehall accused of influencing policy

Found this useful? X LinkedIn
Behind this article

How we put this together

Written by
Blue & Green Tomorrow
Published
Sources
Primary reporting
Standards
About