Monday 24th October 2016                 Change text size:

Labour anger at government’s decision to shelve plain cigarette packaging

Photo: Morgan via Flickr

Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham has demanded answers over Lynton Crosby’s contact with the ministers who made the decision to shelve plans for standardised cigarette packaging.

Burnham also claimed in a letter that Crosby, David Cameron’s election co-ordinator, chaired a meeting in 2012 where tobacco industry executives discussed ways to block the government’s plans to introduce plain cigarette packaging.

British American Tobacco reported a growth of 11% on its Lucky Strike brand in 2012 and an overall company growth of 14.5%, with pre-tax profits rising from £4.9 billion in 2011 to £5.6 billion in 2012.

In a briefing to ministers, anti-smoking group Smokefree Action Coalition highlighted that standardised packaging would remove the attractive nature of smoking to young people and would reinforce health warnings.

The group also claimed that more than 200,000 young people aged under-16 take up smoking every year.

Australia has already implemented standardised packaging and Ireland plan to do so in 2014. Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have also stated their support for the move.

Hilary Emery, chief executive of the National Children’s Bureau, said, “The introduction of standardised packaging for cigarettes and tobacco products would be an important step in cutting the number of children who start smoking every year. Children in poorer communities, and in vulnerable groups such as those in care, are particularly likely to become smokers.”

A survey carried out by Smokefree Action Coalition showed that 65% of UK adults are in support of standardised packaging.

Deborah Arnott, chief executive of Action Smoking and Health (ASH), said “We believe that there is a clear majority in both Houses of Parliament for the policy. If the government has lost its nerve, let parliament decide on a free vote.”

The Guardian claims that tobacco companies are using lobby groups as a “political battering ram”. It adds that the industry is “secretly paying” influential figures, such as philosopher Roger Scruton, who published a report attacking the regulation of tobacco.

A group of researchers from the University of Bath, the Tobacco Control Research Group, found that tobacco firms are using pricing in order to maintain the industry.

Speaking to Blue & Green Tomorrow, one of the researchers said, “Lynton Crosby has been working for quite some time with Phillip Morris, one of the world’s leading tobacco companies. It is quite clear that there is a conflict of interest within the heart of the government.”

Health secretary Jeremy Hunt insisted on Newsnight on Tuesday evening that the government was fully transparent, saying, “Lynton Crosby’s work is for the Conservative Party. He hasn’t lobbied me and he hasn’t lobbied the prime minister on issues to do with public health and there is a clear dividing line.”

Further reading:

Describing tobacco as a ‘defensive stock’ is offensive

Ethical fund challenges stock’s involvement in tobacco sector

Pension fund drops tobacco investment after poor results

On this day in 1957: cancer and smoking linked

British councils announce £44m investment in tobacco firms

Register with Blue and Green

To leave a comment on this article, fill in your details below to register, alternatively if you are already registered you can login here

Subscribe for our Newsletter

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

A password will be e-mailed to you.