Privacy settings

Choose whether optional services may connect to their providers. Your choice is stored on this device for up to 180 days. You can change or withdraw it here anytime.

When an optional service is enabled, its provider may receive your IP address and browser information. Read the full privacy and cookie notice and contact details before choosing. Read privacy and cookies · Contact

Ethical investment & sustainable living · since 2010 Sunday 15 November 2026
Ethical Investment and Sustainable Living The Brief

Search Blue & Green Tomorrow

Saved stories

0
Loading saved stories...

Follow Us

Environment
Desk position: Environment, centre

WWF: Abbot Point dredge plans raise ‘alarming concerns’

The Environment desk

Plans to dump dredged sediment close to the Great Barrier Reef have been fast tracked leading to estimates of damage and risk being underestimated, according to a report for the WWF.

The government’s proposal suggests that 1.7 million cubic metres of dredged seabed will be mixed with sea water, creating 14 million cubic metres of dredge slurry. This will then be settled in ponds in the Caley Valley wetlands, with tailwater discharged back into the water of the Great Barrier Reef.

WWF argues that the plans raise “alarming concerns” and the impacts have not been properly considered.

WWF-Australia reef campaigner Louise Matthiesson commented, “The proposal is full of information gaps big enough to drive a truck through. It contains errors, out-of-date information, and doesn’t even consider some dangers. That’s what happens when a project is fast tracked without a full environmental impact assessment.”

Brett Miller, from the University of New South Wales School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, has advised WWF-Australia that the amount of distributed dredge material is likely to exceed the capacity of the ponds, raising questions about long-term plans.

The organisation has also sought the advice of Professor Richard Bush, from Southern Cross University. He raised “serious concerns” about the risk of acid sulphate and its treatment, which can be harmful to marine life.

In addition to this, Matthiesson stated that there other concerns, including that the ponds will not be lined, allowing seepage, and the construction of the project is proposed for January and February 2015, during the wet season.

“There’s a risk of storm surge and cyclone damage, impacts on turtle hatchlings on the adjacent beach, and there will be maximum disruption to wetland birds as their numbers swell at this time of year,” she explained.

The environmental organisation is calling for the Queensland Government to reconsider the proposal and instead examine the possibility of building longer jetties into deeper water to minimise the need for dredging.

Photo: Paul Toogood via Flickr 

Further reading:

Abbot Point port developers to shelve Great Barrier Reef dredging plan

UNESCO concerned over Australia’s decision on dumping coal waste in Great Barrier Reef waters

Climate change is the biggest threat to Great Barrier Reef

Australian MP says he ‘got it wrong’ on dumping coal waste on Great Barrier Reef

Australian environment minister admits climate change threat to Great Barrier Reef

Found this useful? X LinkedIn
Behind this article

How we put this together

Written by
Blue & Green Tomorrow
Published
Sources
Primary reporting
Standards
About