Canada is lobbying to make oil sands – an energy extraction method that is far more polluting than conventional techniques – accessible to Europe. But according to a leading scientist, this would mean “game over” for the climate.
Professor James Hansen, who recently stepped down from his role at NASA, told The Guardian, “Oil from tar sands makes sense only for a small number of people who are making a lot of money from that product.
“We are getting close to the dangerous level of carbon in the atmosphere and if we add on to that unconventional fossil fuels, which have a tremendous amount of carbon, then the climate problem becomes unsolvable.”
In leaked documents seen by Greenpeace, the UK government has apparently rejected a European proposal to classify oil sands as “highly polluting” under the Fuel Quality Directive (FQD).
According to the UK Tar Sands Network, an anti-tar sands campaign group, the move favours dirty Canadian oil. However, Department of Transport minister Norman Baker said that Greenpeace is “wrong” and that nothing had been decided yet.
Meanwhile, the tar sands industry has increased its efforts to lobby in favour of European imports. The Canadian government itself has doubled its advertising spend on tar sands and natural resources minister Joe Oliver has travelled to the UK to promote oil sands and campaign against the European FQD regulation.
Oil sands release carbon emissions that are 12% higher than conventional oil, because it needs more refinement and more intense energy is extracted and produced.
In addition, tar sands operations have heavily damaged the territory of indigenous communities and led to high incidences of cancer among local people.
The Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN), one of the communities affected by tar sands, is suing Shell for the violation of past agreements that have threatened the rights of communities.
Eriel Deranger, community member and spokesperson for ACFN, said, “We have tried exploring amenable agreements and options with Shell only to be disappointed by their inability to compromise and adjust proposed plans to adequately work with us which has led and continues to lead toward litigation.
“Our culture, lands and rights can no longer stand for unabated and irresponsible development of tar sands in the region by Shell or any operator.”
Like our Facebook Page
Harnessing the Sun: The Far-reaching Benefits of Solar Panels
7 Benefits of Purchasing Sustainable Housing
Our Top Five Sustainable Home Renovations For 2023
6 Ways Eco-Friendly Photographers Can Take Beautiful Natural Pictures
Emerging Research In Seagrass Restoration: What Does The Future Hold?
Sustainable Bites: How To Make Your Diet Eco-Friendly
Coffee Farms & Cloud Forests: Colombia’s New Eco Initiatives
Electric Cars: Are They Worth The Switch?
Maximizing the Efficiency of Deliveries: Strategies for Sustainable Businesses
The Rise of Sustainable Cloud Computing
The Future of Sustainability In The Logistics Industry
Can Eco-Friendly Businesses Embrace VPNs to Bolster Cybersecurity?
UK Lags EU in Installing Heat Pumps to Slow Climate Change
Eight Different Eco-Friendly Developments in the Food Industry
5 Key Areas to Look at When It Comes to Business Sustainability
Addressing Leadership Challenges in Green Entrepreneurship
Holding Eco-Friendly Coins is Greener and More Profitable
5 Reasons That Diamonds Can Be Excellent Green Investments
Eco-Friendly Airlines Use Weather Models to Make Safer Flights
Why Should We Invest in Eco-Friendly Homes?
- Features3 months ago
What is the Eco-Friendliest Option to Wash Your Dishes?
- Environment7 months ago
6 Home Improvements You Can Make to Help the Environment
- Environment11 months ago
How to Ensure Your Home’s Eco-Friendly During Construction?
- Business10 months ago
The Pulp & Paper Industry is Reaching its Sustainability Goals