Ahead of the release of the fifth assessment report by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), climate change believers and deniers are debating whether global warming requires government action and climate change tackling policies.
Lord Nicholas Stern, leading economist and author of the 2006 Stern review on climate change, has warned that the risks of climate change are ‘immense’ and said that governments must not underestimate the economic consequences of rising global temperatures.
The IPCC report will be published on Friday and climate sceptics are already criticising it because of a few mistakes made in the previous report. However, Lord Stern said that the assessment of such a huge amount of information may inevitably contain some errors, but the scientific message remains clear.
“It would be extraordinary and unscientific to argue on the basis of 200 years of evidence that you’re confident that the risks are small”, he said.
“Those who would have us delay have to argue they’re confident the risks are small. It would be an astonishing statement to make in light of all this evidence. It would be absurd to say you are confident that the risks are small.”
Stern also said in a speech at the Royal Society on Tuesday that after the publication of the report, he expected more countries to introduce domestic legislation aiming to reduce emissions in line with the goal of avoiding global warming of more than 2°C.
However, climate sceptics are ready to challenge the IPCC report, even though it says that scientists are 95% sure that humans are the main responsible for climate change.
The climate sceptic think thank Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) published a report on Monday [http://www.thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2013/09/Montford-Consensus1.pdf] saying that the UK’s climate projections made by the Met Office in 2009 were based on a computer error, while the country is wasting billion pounds in projects to tackle climate change. The Met Office dismissed the claim saying, “Sophisticated methods were used for the predictions”.
Earlier this month, the Daily Telegraph and the Daily Mail argued that increasing ice cover in the Arctic was proof that the world was entering a phase of ‘global cooling’, but scientists replied they were focusing on the ‘short term noise’ and missing the long-term effects.
Like our Facebook Page
How to Find an Eco-Friendly Termite Control Service Provider in Malaysia
Eco-Friendly Vegans Win Most Battles Not the War
3 Iconic Chicago Billboards Eco-Friendly Advertisers Can Learn from
EnviroSolar’s Abe Issa Discusses Success in Green Entrepreneurship
How Sports Could Be Impacted by Climate Change
What Eco-Friendly Patients Should Know about Online Therapy
6 Reasons Why Meal Delivery Services are Eco-Friendly
The Path for Retail’s Sustainable Future
4 Eco-Friendly Ways to Treat a Sinus Infection
4 Strategies for Eco-Friendly Real Estate Investors to Find Properties
How Managed Print Services Helps to Reduce Paper Waste
Why Scientists Are Concerned About ‘Forever Chemicals’ In Drinking Water
Meat Farming Is Only Getting Smarter, Easier & Eco-Friendlier
What is Eco-Friendly Homesteading and How Does it Affect Your Insurance?
Importance of Using a Water Purifier in an Area with High Pollution
Alternative Financing Ideas for Green Businesses that Shun Banks
Tencel Material Demand Shows Britain Is More Eco-Friendlier Than Ireland
How To Invest in Clean Energy Stocks in Only Five Easy Steps!
How To Secure Funding As An Eco-Entrepreneur?
4 Amazing Eco-Friendly Businesses Worth Starting in 2021
- Features8 months ago
Seven Health and Safety Tips for Eco-Friendly Products in a Green Home
- Energy9 months ago
Eco-Friendly Homeowners Lower Carbon Footprints through Greater Air Conditioner Efficiency
- Features8 months ago
Essential Guidelines for Eco-friendly Moving into new Home
- Invest10 months ago
The Eco-Friendly Evolution of Bitcoin Over the Years