Connect with us

Environment

New “Smogmobile” Highlights Health Risks To Drivers From Traffic Fumes

Published

on

Drivers and their passengers may be exposed to more harmful pollution inside a vehicle than on the road outside, suggests a pilot study launched today, carried out using the capabilities of a unique mobile air quality laboratory carried in an all-electric, no-emissions van.

On a journey from Reading to central London the new Air Quality Monitoring Vehicle –  nicknamed the smogmobile – sampled air inside and outside the vehicle every minute and found that levels of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) were on average 21% higher inside with the windows shut than on the road outside.

Dr Ben Barratt, Lecturer in Air Quality Science at King’s College London, said: “This illustrative study adds to mounting evidence that vehicles provide little protection from harmful traffic pollution, and drivers and their passengers may even be exposed to higher levels than on the road outside.

“These initial findings highlight the urgent need for further investigation into the health risks faced by motorists and their passengers. It is especially important to understand the impacts of air pollution on professional motorists such as taxi and lorry drivers, who spend many hours behind the wheel each day.”

Recent research has highlighted the damaging impact of NO2, which causes 23,500 deaths a year in the UK, and all but five of 43 regions in the UK breach EU safety limits. Nearly 29,000 additional deaths a year are caused by particulates, fine particles which can lodge in the lungs. Diesel exhaust is the main cause of both pollutants which can aggravate heart and lung conditions and breathing problems.

Duncan Mounsor, Managing Director of Enviro Technology Services, which developed the mobile lab, said: “Air pollution causes more than 50,000 deaths a year in the UK and costs the economy billions. We have developed the Air Quality Monitoring Vehicle to give local authorities and researchers a powerful new tool to plan action to clean up our air and tackle one of our greatest public health challenges.”

The Air Quality Monitoring Vehicle offers a unique combination of features. The battery-powered mobile lab is carried in an all-electric van, so it can measure pollutants and greenhouse gases on the move without contributing any emissions itself. It gathers air quality data in real time, both inside and outside the vehicle, plotting it against GPS coordinates.

It carries state-of-the-art instruments, several of which are more sensitive, more accurate and faster than the UK’s national air quality monitoring network. These include equipment which can make highly accurate, direct measurements of NO2, in contrast to traditional instruments used by the UK’s static air quality monitoring network, which measure NO2 indirectly and are unsuited to fast-changing environments.

Frank Kelly, professor of environmental health at King’s College London, who is also chairman of the government advisory body, the Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollutants, said: “Air pollution is the world’s single largest environmental health risk. It shortens life expectancy, reduces lung function and worsens the symptoms of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart disease.

“The availability of Enviro Technology Services’ new Air Quality Monitoring Vehicle is an important step forward for the UK.  Although London and the UK have extensive fixed site air quality monitoring sites the deployment of a mobile unit will provide instantaneous, onsite data directly relating to a multitude of air quality issues. A priority for the use of this mobile unit must be a more proactive approach to improving air quality by ensuring compliance with ambient air quality standards.”

PILOT NO2 STUDY

The Air Quality Monitoring Vehicle conducted a pilot NO2 study on a two-hour journey from Reading along the M4 and through central London to Waterloo Bridge using its new capabilities. It found that the driver and passenger were consistently exposed to levels of NO2 the same as or higher than those on the road outside. Mean average concentrations of NO2 outside the vehicle were 66 µg m3 (micrograms per cubic metre) but 21% higher inside the vehicle at 80 µg m3.

The Air Quality Monitoring Vehicle also found levels of NO2 inside the vehicle reaching up to 350µg m3 for brief periods in central London. The EU sets an hourly safety limit of 200 µg m3 and an annual limit of 40 µg m3.

Dr Barratt said: “The Air Quality Monitoring Vehicle is a valuable tool for studying the health risks faced by drivers and their passengers and strategies for reducing risk, for example, by testing the effectiveness of different air filters. Up to now we’ve had to carry out research using instruments temporarily fixed to a vehicle. This is a permanent solution carrying robust, high-quality instrumentation, allowing studies to be revisited over time.

“The public health message is, you can’t hide from air pollution inside a car. Many people think that if you cycle or walk you are exposed to more air pollution, but levels are significantly lower at the side of a road than in traffic.

“We advise the public to leave the car at home whenever possible. It exposes you and your family to lower levels of air pollution, you’re not contributing to the problem, and you’re also getting the benefits of exercise. That’s tackling three of our biggest public health challenges in one go: air quality, climate change and obesity.”

Many motorists have the option to walk, cycle or use public transport. On average primary school children live 1.8 miles from school, a 25-minute walk or 15-minute bike ride, yet 44% are driven to school. Nationally, 16.7 million people commute to work by car, including 67% in urban areas outside London and 30% in London.

Smogmobile Chart

Pilot study. Inside and Outside NO2 time series. Note: 0920-0928: van stationary and charging at Reading services. 0929-1014 Reading to Heston services on M4. 1014-1033, charging up battery at Heston services. 1034-1120 Heston services to Waterloo Bridge. Stationary from 1121.

See appendix for Inside and Outside levels of NO2 plotted against location

AIR QUALITY MONITORING VEHICLE CAPABILITIES

The Air Quality Monitoring Vehicle can measure the pollutants with the greatest impact on health, NO2, particulates (PM2.5 and PM10) and ozone, and the most important greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide and methane. It can be hired for short-term surveys to investigate a range of air quality issues at precise locations in real time. Other potential applications include:

– Mapping busy city streets to identify pollution hotspots and test accuracy of computer models.

– Measuring air quality at both head height and pushchair height, where concentrations of pollutants can be higher.

– Monitoring the boundaries of landfill, fracking and other industrial sites to identify leakages of methane, a greenhouse gas which causes 86 times more warming than CO2 over 20 years.

It offers a cost-effective tool for local authorities, which are required to draw up plans to manage air pollution, as well as consultants and air quality researchers. They have largely had to rely on data from expensive static monitoring stations and on monthly data from diffusion tubes, which can only be used once.

All but five of the 43 regions in the UK have breached EU safety limits for NO2 for five years, and in April 2015 the Supreme Court ordered the government to publish a clean-up plan, in a case brought by environmental lawyers ClientEarth. The government published an air quality action plan in December 2015 to bring every region into line by 2020 except London which has a 2025 target. ClientEarth has said it will take the government back to court because the plans do not go far enough.

The main means of monitoring the UK’s air quality is a network of 133 static monitoring stations. Computer models use data from these fixed sites to estimate pollution levels across the whole country and along the busiest roads. However, these monitoring stations are large and expensive. A basic monitoring station measuring NO2 and particulates can cost £35,000 and is too large to install on many city streets.

Economy

Will Self-Driving Cars Be Better for the Environment?

Published

on

self-driving cars for green environment
Shutterstock Licensed Photo - By Zapp2Photo | https://www.shutterstock.com/g/zapp2photo

Technologists, engineers, lawmakers, and the general public have been excitedly debating about the merits of self-driving cars for the past several years, as companies like Waymo and Uber race to get the first fully autonomous vehicles on the market. Largely, the concerns have been about safety and ethics; is a self-driving car really capable of eliminating the human errors responsible for the majority of vehicular accidents? And if so, who’s responsible for programming life-or-death decisions, and who’s held liable in the event of an accident?

But while these questions continue being debated, protecting people on an individual level, it’s worth posing a different question: how will self-driving cars impact the environment?

The Big Picture

The Department of Energy attempted to answer this question in clear terms, using scientific research and existing data sets to project the short-term and long-term environmental impact that self-driving vehicles could have. Its findings? The emergence of self-driving vehicles could essentially go either way; it could reduce energy consumption in transportation by as much as 90 percent, or increase it by more than 200 percent.

That’s a margin of error so wide it might as well be a total guess, but there are too many unknown variables to form a solid conclusion. There are many ways autonomous vehicles could influence our energy consumption and environmental impact, and they could go well or poorly, depending on how they’re adopted.

Driver Reduction?

One of the big selling points of autonomous vehicles is their capacity to reduce the total number of vehicles—and human drivers—on the road. If you’re able to carpool to work in a self-driving vehicle, or rely on autonomous public transportation, you’ll spend far less time, money, and energy on your own car. The convenience and efficiency of autonomous vehicles would therefore reduce the total miles driven, and significantly reduce carbon emissions.

There’s a flip side to this argument, however. If autonomous vehicles are far more convenient and less expensive than previous means of travel, it could be an incentive for people to travel more frequently, or drive to more destinations they’d otherwise avoid. In this case, the total miles driven could actually increase with the rise of self-driving cars.

As an added consideration, the increase or decrease in drivers on the road could result in more or fewer vehicle collisions, respectively—especially in the early days of autonomous vehicle adoption, when so many human drivers are still on the road. Car accident injury cases, therefore, would become far more complicated, and the roads could be temporarily less safe.

Deadheading

Deadheading is a term used in trucking and ridesharing to refer to miles driven with an empty load. Assume for a moment that there’s a fleet of self-driving vehicles available to pick people up and carry them to their destinations. It’s a convenient service, but by necessity, these vehicles will spend at least some of their time driving without passengers, whether it’s spent waiting to pick someone up or en route to their location. The increase in miles from deadheading could nullify the potential benefits of people driving fewer total miles, or add to the damage done by their increased mileage.

Make and Model of Car

Much will also depend on the types of cars equipped to be self-driving. For example, Waymo recently launched a wave of self-driving hybrid minivans, capable of getting far better mileage than a gas-only vehicle. If the majority of self-driving cars are electric or hybrids, the environmental impact will be much lower than if they’re converted from existing vehicles. Good emissions ratings are also important here.

On the other hand, the increased demand for autonomous vehicles could put more pressure on factory production, and make older cars obsolete. In that case, the gas mileage savings could be counteracted by the increased environmental impact of factory production.

The Bottom Line

Right now, there are too many unanswered questions to make a confident determination whether self-driving vehicles will help or harm the environment. Will we start driving more, or less? How will they handle dead time? What kind of models are going to be on the road?

Engineers and the general public are in complete control of how this develops in the near future. Hopefully, we’ll be able to see all the safety benefits of having autonomous vehicles on the road, but without any of the extra environmental impact to deal with.

Continue Reading

Environment

Road Trip! How to Choose the Greenest Vehicle for Your Growing Family

Published

on

Greenest Vehicle
Licensed Image by Shutterstock - By Mascha Tace -- https://www.shutterstock.com/g/maschatace

When you have a growing family, it often feels like you’re in this weird bubble that exists outside of mainstream society. Whereas everyone else seemingly has stability, your family dynamic is continuously in flux. Having said that, is it even possible to buy an eco-friendly vehicle that’s also practical?

What to Look for in a Green, Family-Friendly Vehicle?

As a single person or young couple without kids, it’s pretty easy to buy a green vehicle. Almost every leading car brand has eco-friendly options these days and you can pick from any number of options. The only problem is that most of these models don’t work if you have kids.

Whether it’s a Prius or Smart car, most green vehicles are impractical for large families. You need to look for options that are spacious, reliable, and comfortable – both for passengers and the driver.

5 Good Options

As you do your research and look for different opportunities, it’s good to have an open mind. Here are some of the greenest options for growing families:

1. 2014 Chrysler Town and Country

Vans are not only popular for the room and comfort they offer growing families, but they’re also becoming known for their fuel efficiency. For example, the 2014 Chrysler Town and Country – which was one of CarMax’s most popular minivans of 2017 – has Flex Fuel compatibility and front wheel drive. With standard features like these, you can’t do much better at this price point.

2. 2017 Chrysler Pacifica

If you’re looking for a newer van and are willing to spend a bit more, you can go with Chrysler’s other model, the Pacifica. One of the coolest features of the 2017 model is the hybrid drivetrain. It allows you to go up to 30 miles on electric, before the vehicle automatically switches over to the V6 gasoline engine. For short trips and errands, there’s nothing more eco-friendly in the minivan category.

3. 2018 Volkswagen Atlas

Who says you have to buy a minivan when you have a family? Sure, the sliding doors are nice, but there are plenty of other options that are both green and spacious. The new Volkswagen Atlas is a great choice. It’s one of the most fuel-efficient third-row vehicles on the market. The four-cylinder model gets an estimated 26 mpg highway.

4. 2015 Hyundai Sonata Hybrid

While a minivan or SUV is ideal – and necessary if you have more than two kids – you can get away with a roomy sedan when you still have a small family. And while there are plenty of eco-friendly options in this category, the 2015 Hyundai Sonata Hybrid is arguably the biggest bang for your buck. It gets 38 mpg on the highway and is incredibly affordable.

5. 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Sport Diesel

If money isn’t an object and you’re able to spend any amount to get a good vehicle that’s both comfortable and eco-friendly, the 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Sport Diesel is your car. Not only does it get 28 mpg highway, but it can also be equipped with a third row of seats and a diesel engine. And did we mention that this car looks sleek?

Putting it All Together

You have a variety of options. Whether you want something new or used, would prefer an SUV or minivan, or want something cheap or luxurious, there are plenty of choices on the market. The key is to do your research, remain patient, and take your time. Don’t get too married to a particular transaction, or you’ll lose your leverage.

You’ll know when the right deal comes along, and you can make a smart choice that’s functional, cost-effective, and eco-friendly.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Facebook

Trending