The Carbon Tracker Initiative has warned fossil fuel companies to stress test their business model against low carbon, low price scenarios or risk shareholder value falling.
Working with the Energy Transition Advisors, the organisation has published a blueprint examining the impact of limiting global temperature rise to 2C on the fossil fuels industry, focusing on oil and gas. The report argues that stress testing business models can benefit businesses, and in turn shareholders.
Paul Spedding, advisor to Carbon Tracker and co-author of the blueprint, said, “Senior management is overly focused on demand and price scenarios that assume business as usual. As such, there may be a risk assessment ‘gap’ between a management’s view of the future and that resulting from action on climate change, technological advances and changing economic assumptions.
“Critically, the greatest impact will – initially – not be directly from reduced demand, but from the consequent pressure on commodity prices.”
While Carbon Tracker acknowledges that many fossil fuels companies recognisethe threat posed by climate change an the energy transition, their forecasts often do not aligned with other organisations’ projections.
The blueprint recommends that fossil fuel companies carry out a “through risk assessment on the implications of an energy transition including demands and price pathways that differ from the status quo”. In particular it highlights indications of cashflow and revenue from commodity price change, the flexibility built into the company’s five-year investment programme and the project portfolios such as internal rates of return and breakeven price curves as being key indicators.
Carbon Tracker research advisor Mark Fulton, who also co-authored the report, commented, “Focusing on higher Internal rates of return and lower-cost projects reduces risk for companies and shareholder. It might also create additional value by improving stock ratings should historic return-rating relationships persist.”
He continued that the blueprint advances the risk management process that tests for an ‘orderly energy transition’ and considers a ‘disorderly’ one where change is abrupt. This means that it tests business models to the limit, demonstrating how shareholder value could be destroyed.
Photo: Ingy The Wingy via Flickr
Like our Facebook Page
Investing in a Sustainable Environmental Future for Northern Virginia
Prominent Trends in Seafood Sustainability in 2022
Can PEMF Help To Improve Plant Growth for Eco-Friendly Gardeners
How the U.S. Government is Promoting Green Energy in the Country
12 Essential Things for Buying Your First Home
Harnessing Sustainability with User-Centric Technology Innovation
Making Your Dream of Having an Eco-Friendly Garden Come True
Tips for Optimal Waste Management in Your Home
The Agricultural Benefits of Weather Stations for Eco-Friendly Farmers
What Makes Online Furniture Eco-Friendly?
7 Eco-Friendly Plant-Based Alternatives for Everyday Products
Top 5 Benefits of Eco-Friendly Cars
Why Eco-Friendly Homes Should Have Outdoor Bathrooms
Merits of Sustainability Reporting: What Every Manager Must Know
Low Emission and Clean Air Zones: What You Need To Know
4 Ways To Build A Sustainable Home
CEO Brian Ladin Explains How The Shipping Industry Is Going Green
A Guide to Eco-Friendly Landscaping
Why Transitioning Your Company to an EV Fleet Makes Sense?
6 Practices for Sustainable and Eco-Friendly Plant Operations
- Features11 months ago
Seven Health and Safety Tips for Eco-Friendly Products in a Green Home
- Energy11 months ago
Eco-Friendly Homeowners Lower Carbon Footprints through Greater Air Conditioner Efficiency
- Features11 months ago
Essential Guidelines for Eco-friendly Moving into new Home
- Features10 months ago
5 Compelling Reasons to Hire an Eco-Friendly Contractor