Thursday 27th October 2016                 Change text size:

The Global Reporting Initiative: leading the way for corporate sustainability reporting


Sustainability has undeniably risen up the corporate agenda in recent years, and with it has risen the reporting of organisations’ behaviour and impacts on the wider world. The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) is the world leader in the reporting of corporate sustainability.

The international, network-based, not-profit offers a comprehensive, pioneering and free-to-use Sustainability Reporting Framework. The framework includes guidelines that set out principles and standards that organisations – from businesses to NGOs – can use to report their economic, environmental, and social performance and impacts.

“GRI’s guidelines lay out a step-by-step process which allows any organisation to begin the reporting process,” explains Tuulia Syvanen, chief of staff at GRI.

“There are five stages: preparing a plan to produce the sustainability report, connecting with stakeholders, defining what content to include in the report, monitoring the relevant data and finally compiling all of this info into a sustainability report.”

More than 5,000 organisations, from all corners of the world, now use these guidelines to measure the impacts of their operations. GRI’s framework was not only the first of its kind; it is now the mostly widely used.

Wherever sustainable and responsible investment markets grow, the GRI is never far away. Australia’s recent awakening, for example, has seen the number of organisations down under adopting GRI guidelines double in the past six years.

GRI’s rise began in the US in 1997, when it was founded in Boston, MA, by sustainability advocates Ceres and the Tellus Institute.

Originally existing as a department within Ceres, the GRI first published its guidelines in 2000. Two years later, at the Johannesburg Earth Summit, its second generation of guidelines was inked into the Plan of Implementation signed by all contributing nations. 

Its permanence secured, that year the institute set down roots in Amsterdam, where its main offices remain. In 2006 it published its third set of guidelines, called G3. Created with the help of over 3,000 experts from various sectors, G3 set the GRI on course towards the lofty position it holds today.

It expanded into new areas, offering coaching and guidance for sustainability reporting novices, and various certifications. Its truly international team – representing 32 nationalities – is now made up of 68 employees. Behind them now stands a growing network of thousands of individuals from all sectors and backgrounds. As of 2013, GRI moved on to G4.

In this relatively short stretch of time, the business world’s understanding, perception of and approach towards sustainability has changed fundamentally.

The concept has ditched its outsider status and gone mainstream, now sitting in boardrooms around the world. Some 93% of the largest companies in the world now prepare sustainability reports.

In this time, the GRI has remained not only relevant but at the forefront. Of that 93%, 82% refer to GRI guidelines in producing their reports.

“Though we are pleased with how many organisations use our guidelines to produce their sustainability reports, we remain committed to bringing even more organisations onboard,” Syvanen says.

She adds that in particular, GRI wants to see many more small and medium-sized firms begin reporting.

Indeed, while the uptake of corporate sustainability is encouraging, it is not enough. The dire warnings of scientists, frequent environmental disasters and corporate scandals illustrate clearly that more needs to be done.  

This is why the GRI’s ultimate ambition is to play a role in making sustainability reporting standard practice worldwide. Working towards this goal, GRI has recently announced that going forward it will have a strong focus on collaboration with other reporting standards organisations

Now that so many large companies are reporting, one of the GRI’s new missions is to improve the quality of the information that is disclosed.

“It’s not enough for organisations to just produce a sustainability report. In order for stakeholders to benefit from sustainability reporting it is essential that organisations produce robust reports that focus on the material impacts of the organisation’s operations,” Syvanen says. 

“Enabling organisations to produce higher quality reports is the core principle behind our latest set of guidelines.”

The organisation has also recently welcomed a new chief executive in Michael Meehan, a veteran of several clean-tech businesses and sustainability reporting projects. He replaces Ernst Ligteringen, who departs after 12 years of stewardship, 12 years of keeping GRI at the top. 

Corporate sustainability – its priorities, its requirements – will always be changing. It is a rapidly changing world, but GRI looks certain to keep pace.

Take our 2014 reader survey and you could win an iPad, Kindle or donation to a charity of your choice.

Further reading:

Ceres initiative looks to boost stock exchange sustainability reporting

51% of corporations emitting unsustainable levels of CO2, study finds

Calls for greater investment transparency applies to more than ethical funds

Are these the world’s ‘most’ sustainable companies?

Revised sustainability framework looks to cut out ‘tick box reporting’

There are currently no comments.

Register with Blue and Green

To leave a comment on this article, fill in your details below to register, alternatively if you are already registered you can login here

Subscribe for our Newsletter

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

A password will be e-mailed to you.