HM Revenue and Customs has “lost its nerve” in the fight against tax avoidance by multinational corporations and wealthy individuals, a committee of MPs has claimed.
In a new report, the public accounts committee says that that HMRC is not using the full range of sanctions it has at its disposal to pursue tax avoiders.
This failure is illustrated, the MPs say, by amount of tax collected from British holders of Swiss bank accounts.
In his 2012 autumn statement, chancellor of the exchequer George Osborne said HMRC would collect over £3.1 billion from such accounts by March 2014. So far this year, only £440m has been brought in.
Despite promises from officials to crack down on tax dodgers, in real terms, tax income fell last year when compared to 2011/12. In 2011/12, the disparity between the amount expected by the exchequer and the amount actually collected grew by around £1 billion.
Margaret Hodge, chair of the public accounts committee, said HMRC had failed to show that it was on the side of the majority of people who pay their taxes in full.
“HMRC holds back from using the full range of sanctions at its disposal”, she said.
“It pursues tax owed by the smaller businesses but seems to lose its nerve when it comes to mounting prosecutions against multinational corporations.”
The committee suggested that in its efforts to attract investment in the country, HMRC was allowing international corporations to dodge taxes.
“Changes in the controlled foreign-company rules and the failure to close the loophole created by eurobonds are two examples showing where it has become easier for companies to avoid tax while ordinary people continue to pay their share”, Hodge added.
In August it was revealed that the number of criminal prosecutions for tax evasion in the UK had more than doubled in a year. However, critics claimed that HMRC had specifically targeted middle class professionals such as doctors and lawyers, instead of the richer evaders who may be harder to prosecute, in order to boost its success rate.
The public accounts committee noted how the lack of prosecutions against big multinationals contrasted with HMRC’s crackdown on smaller businesses.
The tax authority rejected the committee’s findings, saying they had used figures selectively.
A spokesman added, “HMRC seeks to collect the tax that is due from all taxpayers, so that everyone pays their fair share in accordance with the tax laws passed by parliament.”
Like our Facebook Page
Strange Ways the Sporting World Impacts the Environment
The Future of Cryptocurrency is Eco-Friendlier than the Present
Why Bill Gates Is Wrong on the Climate Impact of Bitcoin
Everything You Need to Know to Create an Eco-Friendly Nursery
4 Environmental Benefits of Using A Buckwheat Pillow
Eco-Friendly Ways to Dispose of The Office Furniture!
7 Huge Advantages of Using Solar Power at Home
5 Important Changes to Become An Eco-Friendly Nicotine User
4 Great Ways to be a Committed Eco-Tourist While Flying
7 Basic Types of Forex Charts Ethical Investors Must Understand
How to Make Your Ecommerce Business More Eco-Friendly?
How Can Social Media Help In Promoting Sustainable Lifestyle?
Luxury Development for The Ultra-Rich Causing Climate Change Conundrum in Barbuda
How Does Bitcoin Mining Work and is it Eco-Friendly?
Is Gen Z Ahead of Millennials in Terms of Eco-Investing?
Four Reasons Why Buying Used Cars Is the Way to Go Green
There is no Planet B: The Growing Importance of ESG
Wonderful Environmental Monitoring Tips to Keep Indoor Air Clean
The Tremendous Benefits of Investing in Energy-Efficient Windows
4 Morning Productivity Tips for Green Entrepreneurs that Are Night Owls
- Features10 months ago
Eco-Friendly Interior Design Is Easier Than You Might Think
- Features7 months ago
Eco-Friendly Hacks To Create A Durable Shop For Your Home
- Features8 months ago
5 Simple Ways To Create A Greener And Healthier Home
- Environment11 months ago
The Benefits Of Sustainable Agriculture For Farmers