HM Revenue and Customs has “lost its nerve” in the fight against tax avoidance by multinational corporations and wealthy individuals, a committee of MPs has claimed.
In a new report, the public accounts committee says that that HMRC is not using the full range of sanctions it has at its disposal to pursue tax avoiders.
This failure is illustrated, the MPs say, by amount of tax collected from British holders of Swiss bank accounts.
In his 2012 autumn statement, chancellor of the exchequer George Osborne said HMRC would collect over £3.1 billion from such accounts by March 2014. So far this year, only £440m has been brought in.
Despite promises from officials to crack down on tax dodgers, in real terms, tax income fell last year when compared to 2011/12. In 2011/12, the disparity between the amount expected by the exchequer and the amount actually collected grew by around £1 billion.
Margaret Hodge, chair of the public accounts committee, said HMRC had failed to show that it was on the side of the majority of people who pay their taxes in full.
“HMRC holds back from using the full range of sanctions at its disposal”, she said.
“It pursues tax owed by the smaller businesses but seems to lose its nerve when it comes to mounting prosecutions against multinational corporations.”
The committee suggested that in its efforts to attract investment in the country, HMRC was allowing international corporations to dodge taxes.
“Changes in the controlled foreign-company rules and the failure to close the loophole created by eurobonds are two examples showing where it has become easier for companies to avoid tax while ordinary people continue to pay their share”, Hodge added.
In August it was revealed that the number of criminal prosecutions for tax evasion in the UK had more than doubled in a year. However, critics claimed that HMRC had specifically targeted middle class professionals such as doctors and lawyers, instead of the richer evaders who may be harder to prosecute, in order to boost its success rate.
The public accounts committee noted how the lack of prosecutions against big multinationals contrasted with HMRC’s crackdown on smaller businesses.
The tax authority rejected the committee’s findings, saying they had used figures selectively.
A spokesman added, “HMRC seeks to collect the tax that is due from all taxpayers, so that everyone pays their fair share in accordance with the tax laws passed by parliament.”
Like our Facebook Page
How to Find an Eco-Friendly Termite Control Service Provider in Malaysia
Eco-Friendly Vegans Win Most Battles Not the War
3 Iconic Chicago Billboards Eco-Friendly Advertisers Can Learn from
EnviroSolar’s Abe Issa Discusses Success in Green Entrepreneurship
How Sports Could Be Impacted by Climate Change
What Eco-Friendly Patients Should Know about Online Therapy
6 Reasons Why Meal Delivery Services are Eco-Friendly
The Path for Retail’s Sustainable Future
4 Eco-Friendly Ways to Treat a Sinus Infection
4 Strategies for Eco-Friendly Real Estate Investors to Find Properties
How Managed Print Services Helps to Reduce Paper Waste
Why Scientists Are Concerned About ‘Forever Chemicals’ In Drinking Water
Meat Farming Is Only Getting Smarter, Easier & Eco-Friendlier
What is Eco-Friendly Homesteading and How Does it Affect Your Insurance?
Importance of Using a Water Purifier in an Area with High Pollution
Alternative Financing Ideas for Green Businesses that Shun Banks
Tencel Material Demand Shows Britain Is More Eco-Friendlier Than Ireland
How To Invest in Clean Energy Stocks in Only Five Easy Steps!
How To Secure Funding As An Eco-Entrepreneur?
4 Amazing Eco-Friendly Businesses Worth Starting in 2021
- Features8 months ago
Seven Health and Safety Tips for Eco-Friendly Products in a Green Home
- Energy9 months ago
Eco-Friendly Homeowners Lower Carbon Footprints through Greater Air Conditioner Efficiency
- Features8 months ago
Essential Guidelines for Eco-friendly Moving into new Home
- Invest10 months ago
The Eco-Friendly Evolution of Bitcoin Over the Years