Conservative MP and chairman of the energy and climate change committee, Tim Yeo has said that the problem of stranded assets within the fossil fuel industry is real. The comments come as the chief executive of Shell said the current energy debate was “naïve”.
Speaking at the International Petroleum Week annual dinner, Ben van Beurden, head of Shell, claimed that the climate change debate often boiled down to “fossil fuels out, renewables in”, adding that this is a “naïve” view of a sustainable energy future. Van Burden argued that fossil fuels will need to underpin energy for decades to come and, as a result, the risk of stranded assets is minimal.
He also called on the fossil fuels industry to actively engage in the climate change debate, stating the sector “should be less aloof, more assertive”.
In response, Yeo has said the company should be wary as investors are increasingly considering the long term. According to the Guardian, Yeo said, “I do believe the problem of stranded assets is a real one now.
“Investors are starting to think by 2030 the world will be in such a panic about climate change that either by law or by price it will be very hard to burn fossil fuels on anything like the scale we are doing at the moment.”
He continued that fossil fuel companies should consider potential incoming regulation as the world moves to a low-carbon future. Yeo explained, “There may well be national [carbon] performance standards. There may well be caps everywhere. We now have a nuclear non-proliferation treaty, we may have then a coal-fired power station non-proliferations treaty and you can monitor these things externally.
“Or we may have a carbon prices at $50 and investors think ahead so they think the world will have to be a low carbon one in the 2030s and pension funds with 25 year time horizons must take this into account. So the oil companies and gas companies have to recognise this.”
The term ‘stranded assets’ comes from the theory that fossil fuel companies will have assets or reserves that they cannot use once the need to tackle climate change is factored in. Governments are increasingly imposing tougher regulations, potentially meaning that companies and investors will lose out if fossil fuel assets cannot be used.
A recent study suggests that a third of oil reserves, half of gas reserves and over 80% of current coal reserves must not be used before 2050 if global warming is to stay below 2C.
Photo: Greg Goebel via Flickr
Like our Facebook Page
How to Find an Eco-Friendly Termite Control Service Provider in Malaysia
Eco-Friendly Vegans Win Most Battles Not the War
3 Iconic Chicago Billboards Eco-Friendly Advertisers Can Learn from
EnviroSolar’s Abe Issa Discusses Success in Green Entrepreneurship
How Sports Could Be Impacted by Climate Change
What Eco-Friendly Patients Should Know about Online Therapy
6 Reasons Why Meal Delivery Services are Eco-Friendly
The Path for Retail’s Sustainable Future
4 Eco-Friendly Ways to Treat a Sinus Infection
4 Strategies for Eco-Friendly Real Estate Investors to Find Properties
How Managed Print Services Helps to Reduce Paper Waste
Why Scientists Are Concerned About ‘Forever Chemicals’ In Drinking Water
Meat Farming Is Only Getting Smarter, Easier & Eco-Friendlier
What is Eco-Friendly Homesteading and How Does it Affect Your Insurance?
Importance of Using a Water Purifier in an Area with High Pollution
Alternative Financing Ideas for Green Businesses that Shun Banks
Tencel Material Demand Shows Britain Is More Eco-Friendlier Than Ireland
How To Invest in Clean Energy Stocks in Only Five Easy Steps!
How To Secure Funding As An Eco-Entrepreneur?
4 Amazing Eco-Friendly Businesses Worth Starting in 2021
- Features8 months ago
Seven Health and Safety Tips for Eco-Friendly Products in a Green Home
- Energy9 months ago
Eco-Friendly Homeowners Lower Carbon Footprints through Greater Air Conditioner Efficiency
- Features8 months ago
Essential Guidelines for Eco-friendly Moving into new Home
- Invest10 months ago
The Eco-Friendly Evolution of Bitcoin Over the Years