George Osborne spoke with passion when asked by the BBC to give the “economic case” for HS2 yesterday. Alex Blackburne writes how the chancellor’s answer revealed his true colours when it comes to renewable energy.
The second phase of the government’s controversial high-speed rail network was revealed a little over 24 hours ago. The latest announcement said that the £32 billion project will connect Manchester, Leeds, Sheffield and the East Midlands, with phase one joining Birmingham with London.
At a time when economic growth – and even more importantly, sustainable economic growth – is highly sought after, following the news last week that the UK’s economy shrank by 0.3% in the final quarter of 2012, HS2 marks a step forward in the government’s plans to revitalise its transport infrastructure, even if there have been some pretty strong and justified arguments against its development.
Speaking to BBC Breakfast yesterday morning, George Osborne waxed lyrical about the economic potential of the newly-unveiled plans. But reading deeper into his comments brings to light some confusing signals regarding the UK’s long-term prosperity.
He said, “I think [HS2] is the engine for growth in the North and the Midlands of this country; I think it’s going to create tens of thousands of jobs here in Manchester [and] across our great cities, and in the end as a country, you’ve got to make those long-term choices.
“If our predecessors hadn’t decided to build the railways in the Victorian times or the motorways in the middle part of the 20th century, then we wouldn’t have those things today. So you’ve got to commit to these projects even though they’ll take many years.
“And yes, they’re expensive, but they’re also an investment in an economy that will then create the money that will enable us to afford to NHS, the education system and so on.”
We’re so used to hearing the chancellor come out with such soundbites as “we’re all in this together” and that the government has “tough decisions” to make (see George Osborne Bingo) that when he said something about ensuring sustainable investment for the good of the UK’s future economy, one could be forgiven for being slightly taken aback.
This is George Osborne, who once described the environmental and renewable energy sectors as an “environmental Taliban”. George Osborne, who has championed an inherently short-term ‘dash for gas’ over clean and limitless energy sources. And George Osborne, who Blue & Green Tomorrow named as one of the four horsemen of the climate apocalypse last year – the people negatively affecting the climate change debate from their powerful platforms in the public eye.
What’s sad, though, is that Osborne clearly has an ideological agenda against renewable energy. His comments about HS2 prove that he gets the notion of green growth and investing for the long-term to benefit people, the planet and prosperity. Weaning ourselves off dirty, expensive fossil fuels in favour of cleaner sources of energy is possibly the most important facet of this.
An undercover Greenpeace investigation in November recorded climate sceptic MP Peter Lilley saying that the chancellor “doesn’t need persuading” when it comes to launching an anti-wind revolt within government, and his autumn statement a month later did little in dispelling this view.
“Mr Osborne, it is highly debatable whether our economy is healing. What is certain is that our planet is hurting and we needed you to do so much more”, we wrote at the time.
Despite displaying opposing political allegiances, Labour leader Ed Miliband and Conservative MP Zac Goldsmith both warned last year that potential investors could lose interest in the UK if the squabbling, uncertainty and instability within government continued.
The publication of the energy bill went some way to reinstalling confidence in the green economy, but its lack of a decarbonisation target and its heavy reliance on gas not only undermines some of the incredible work being done in the renewables industry, but also makes the UK’s job harder in terms of meeting legally-binding carbon reduction targets.
Osborne should be applauded for wanting the UK to make long-term, sustainable economic choices. But sadly, he’s so far ignored what the public wants and done his best to reject one of the biggest growth industries we have at our disposal.
Like our Facebook Page
Can You Use Your PC In an Eco-Friendly Manner?
How Pain Management Hurts the Environment, and What You Can Do to Help
4 Countries That Have Banned Single-Use Plastic
What Is Your Carbon Footprint and How Can You Reduce it?
How Business Leaders Can Positively Impact Water Scarcity
Plant-Based Protein Coffee is Eco-Friendly & Healthy
Eco-Friendly Restaurants That Are Bringing the Outside Inside
5 Environmental Benefits of Custom Manufacturing
How to Reduce the Carbon Footprint of Your Office
Benefits of Starting an Eco-Friendly eCommerce Business
Brian Sheth and Sheth Sangreal Foundation Donate $15 Million to Global Wildlife Conservation
Eco-Friendly Gardeners Can Make Compost from Organic Waste
8 Great Tips to Find an Eco-Conscious Moving Company
Can Employers Help the Planet with Work from Home Policies?
Creating a Green Basement Environment for a Healthier Home
Switching to an Electric Car to Help the Environment? Here’s How to Find the Cheapest Insurance
More People Are Practicing Eco-Conscious Lawn-Care
Choosing the Best Air Filter as Pollution Levels Worsen
9 Tips to Write Stellar Papers as an Environmental Science Major
Why You Need to Know These Hard Facts About Ethical Investing
- Energy3 months ago
How To Choose the Right Solar Inverter for Your Home?
- Energy3 months ago
How to Choose the Best Solar Panel for Your Home
- Environment10 months ago
Importance of Using a Water Purifier in an Area with High Pollution
- Environment3 months ago
Reduce Industry Footprints with Sustainable Material Swaps