Connect with us

Energy

InfluenceMap Analysis : Rex Tillerson, Exxon And Climate Lobbying

Published

on

InfluenceMap Analysis : Rex Tillerson, Exxon And Climate Lobbying

InfluenceMap has assessed CEO Rex Tillerson and ExxonMobil’s record on lobbying climate change policy as he is nominated to be the next US Secretary of State.

While it has been reported that the ExxonMobil CEO has expressed support for the Paris Agreement on climate change, our objective survey of over 200 global industrial companies and 40 lobby groups shows the company has engaged in a systematic pattern of opposing climate policy on a worldwide scale. This was true before and after the Paris Agreement was reached in 2015. The company’s lobbying is conducted directly and through a global network of trade associations and advocacy groups, like the American Legislative Exchange Council – a group that ranks as the most climate obstructive in InfluenceMap’s survey.

ExxonMobil’s Direct Climate Lobbying

  • Carbon Taxes: ExxonMobil claims to support a carbon tax but this is based on the tax being ‘revenue neutral‘, which it considers the least worst regulatory option. CEO Rex Tillerson has emphasised that the cost of carbon taxes would fall on “those less able to bear it” (May 2014). At the same time, ExxonMobil appears to be funding US lawmakers who have opposed carbon taxes.
  • Greenhouse Gas Targets: ExxonMobil opposes significant greenhouse gas emissions targets. It believes the impact of climate driven policy changes are beyond what society is willing to accept. While ExxonMobil does not openly promote the climate science misinformation as it has for previous decades, CEO Rex Tillerson has repeatedly made reference to the uncertainty of climate change models as a justification for inaction, including in 2015.
  • Emissions Trading: ExxonMobil does not support emissions trading as a means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and this opposition extends to the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. CEO Rex Tillerson believes that emissions trading schemes have been wholly ineffective and has used ExxonMobil’s support for a carbon tax as a pretext for opposing emissions trading.
  • Renewable Energy Policy: ExxonMobil appears to have a global campaign of lobbying against renewable energy policies suggested by the IPCC, the US EPA and the European Commission DG Clima. This includes through a web of think-tanks that Exxon-Mobil continues to fund.

ExxonMobil’s Lobbying Agents

  • American Petroleum Institute (API): CEO Rex Tillerson is on the executive committee of the API, which has aggressively opposed US climate policy for the last decade.
  • American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC): A senior ExxonMobil executive is on the Private Enterprise Advisory Council of ALEC, an organisation that has disseminated climate change denial whilst being instrumental in corporate-funded legal action against key US climate change regulation, including the Clean Power Plan and other renewable energy legislation.
  • Western States Petroleum Institute (WSPI): ExxonMobil is a member of the WSPI which aggressively opposed climate change bills AB32 and SB 350 in California.
  • National Association of Manufacturers (NAM): ExxonMobil executive Neil Chapman is on the Executive Committee of NAM which has opposed climate change legislation including cap and trade policy in California, carbon taxes, and energy efficiency targets.
  • European Groups: In Europe, ExxonMobil is a member of BusinessEurope corporate advisory group and holds senior positions in CEFIC and FuelsEurope all of which have opposed EU climate targets, as well as reforms to the EU ETS.

Download the media note and infographic here.

The idea that Rex Tillerson may be supportive of ambitious climate policy is not at all consistent with our forensic analysis of the activities of his company ExxonMobil

“The idea that Rex Tillerson may be supportive of ambitious climate policy is not at all consistent with our forensic analysis of the activities of his company ExxonMobil and its trade associations. We assess them to be opposed to climate policy solutions advocated by the the US EPA, the IPCC and other mandated bodies, on a global and systematic scale, both before and after the Paris Treaty.” Dylan Tanner, Executive Director, InfluenceMap

Energy

Are the UK Governments Plans for the Energy Sector Smart?

Published

on

The revolution in the energy sector marches on, wind turbines and solar panels are harnessing more renewable energy than ever before – so where is it all leading?

The UK government have recently announced plans to modernise the way we produce, store and use electricity. And, if realised, the plans could be just the thing to bring the energy sector in line with 21st century technology and ideologies.

Central to the plans is an initiative that will see smart meters installed in homes and businesses the length and breadth of the country – and their aim? To create an environment where electricity can be managed more efficiently.

The news has prompted some speculation about how energy suppliers will react and many are predicting a price war. This could benefit consumers of electricity and investors, many of whom may be looking to make a profit by trading energy company shares online using platforms such as Oanda – but the potential for good news doesn’t end there.

Introducing New Technology

The plan, titled Smart Systems and Flexibility is being rolled out in the hope that it will have a positive impact in three core areas.

  • To offer consumers greater control by making smart meters available for all homes and businesses by 2020. Energy users will be able to monitor, control and record the amount of energy they use.
  • Incentivise energy suppliers to change the manner in which they buy electricity, to offer more smart tariffs and more off-peak periods for energy consumption.
  • Introduce new standards for electrical appliances – it is hoped that the new wave of appliances will recognise when electricity is at its cheapest and at its most expensive and respond accordingly.

How the Plans Will Affect Solar Energy

Around 7 million houses in the UK have solar panels and the government say that their plan will benefit them as they will be able to store electricity on batteries. The stored energy can then be used by the household and excess energy can be exported to the national grid – in this instance lower tariffs or even payment for the excess energy will bring down annual costs significantly.

The rate of return on energy exported to the national grid is currently between 6% and 10%, but there are many variables to take into account, such as, the cost of battery storage and light levels. Still, those with state-of-the-art solar electricity systems could end up with an annual profit after selling their excess energy.

The Internet of Things

Much of what the plans set out to achieve are linked to the now ubiquitous “internet of things” – where, for example, appliances and heating systems are connected to the internet in order to make them function more smartly.

Companies like Hive have already made great inroads into this type of technology, but the road that the government plans are heading down, will, potentially, go much further -blockchain technology looms and has already proved to be a game changer in the world of currency.

Blockchain Technology

It has already been suggested that the peer to peer selling of energy and exporting it to the national grid may eventually be done using blockchain technology.

“The blockchain is an incorruptible digital ledger of economic transactions that can be programmed to record not just financial transactions but virtually everything of value.”

Don and Alex Tapscott, Blockchain Revolution (2016)

The upshot of the government’s plans for the revolution of the energy sector, is that technology will play an indelible role in making it more efficient, more flexible and ultimately more sustainable.

Continue Reading

Energy

4 Case Studies on the Benefits of Solar Energy

Published

on

By

Demand for solar energy is growing at a surprising rate. New figures from SolarPower Europe show that solar energy production has risen 50% since the summer of 2016.

However, many people are still skeptical of the benefits of solar energy.Does it actually make a significant reduction in our carbon footprint? Is it actually cost-effective for the company over the long-run?

A number of case studies have been conducted, which indicate solar energy can be enormously beneficial. Here are some of the most compelling studies on the subject.

1.     Boulder Nissan

When you think of companies that leverage solar power, car dealerships probably aren’t the first ones that come to mind. However, Boulder Nissan is highly committed to promoting green energy. They worked with Independent Power Systems to setup a number of solar cells. Here were the results:

  • Boulder Nissan has reduced coal generated electricity by 65%.
  • They are on track to run on 100% renewable energy within the next 13 years.
  • Boulder Nissan reduced CO2 emissions by 416,000 lbs. within the first year after installing their solar panels.

This is one of the most impressive solar energy case studies a small business has published in recent years. It shows that even small companies in rural communities can make a major difference by adapting solar energy.

2.     Valley Electric Association

In 2015, the Valley Electric Association (VEA) created an 80-acre solar garden. Before retiring from the legislature, U.S. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid praised the new project as a way to make the state more energy dependent and reduce our carbon footprint.

“This facility will provide its customers with the opportunity to purchase 100 percent of their electricity from clean energy produced in Nevada,” Reid told reporters with the Pahrump Valley Times. “That’s a step forward for the Silver State, but it also proves that utilities can work with customers to provide clean renewable energy that they demand.”

The solar energy that VEA produced was drastically higher than anyone would have predicted. SolarWorld estimates that the solar garden created 32,680,000 kwh every year, which was enough to power nearly 4,000 homes.

This was a major undertaking for a purple state, which may inspire their peers throughout the Midwest to develop solar gardens of their own. It will reduce dependency on the electric grid, which is a problem for many remote states in the central part of the country.

3.     Las Vegas Casinos

A number of Las Vegas casinos have started investing in solar panels over the last couple of years. The Guardian reports that many of these casinos have cut costs considerably. Some of them are even selling the energy back to the grid.

“It’s no accident that we put the array on top of a conference center. This is good business for us,” Cindy Ortega, chief sustainability officer at MGM Resorts told Guardian reporters. “We are looking at leaving the power system, and one of the reasons for that is we can procure more renewable energy on the open market.”

There have been many benefits for casinos using solar energy. They are some of the most energy-intensive institutions in the world, so this has helped them become much more cost-effective. It also helps minimize disruptions to their customers learning online keno strategies in the event of any problems with the electric grid.

4.     Boston College

Boston College has been committed to many green initiatives over the years. A group of researchers experimented with solar cells on different parts of the campus to see where they could produce the most electricity. They discovered that the best locationwas at St. Clement’sHall. The solar cells there dramatically. It would also reduce CO2 emissions by 521,702 lbs. a year and be enough to save 10,869 trees.

Boston College is exploring new ways to expand their usage of solar cells. They may be able to invest in more effective solar panels that can generate far more solar energy.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Facebook

Trending