The Asset Owners Disclosure Project (AODP) annual report has revealed that climate change is rapidly moving up the agenda for the world’s biggest investors. Pension funds and insurers are recognising the need for action to protect the savings and the financial security of hundreds of millions of people.
Ninety seven of the world’s 500 biggest investors with $US9.4 trillion in funds are taking tangible action to mitigate climate change risk and last year saw a big rise in support for shareholder resolutions and low carbon investment, according to the fourth Global Climate 500 Index. Another 157 investors, worth $14.2 trillion, are taking their first steps.
Despite this, very few investors are acting on warnings from the G20’s Financial Stability Board that climate action could leave fossil fuel and other high-carbon investments as worthless stranded assets, and 246 investors, with $14 trillion in funds, are ignoring climate change risk completely.
Julian Poulter, CEO at AODP, said: “Climate change risk is now a mainstream issue for institutional investors and last year has seen many significantly step up their action to manage this.
“However, only a handful are protecting their portfolios from the very real danger of stranded assets, and it is shocking that nearly half the world’s biggest investors are doing nothing at all to mitigate climate risk.
“Pensions funds and insurers that ignore climate change are gambling with the savings and financial security of hundreds of millions of people around the world and risking another financial crisis.”
The independent non-profit AODP rates the world’s 500 biggest investors on their success at managing climate risk within their portfolios, based on direct disclosures and publicly available information.
They include pension funds, insurers, sovereign wealth funds, foundations and endowments, with $38 trillion of assets under management (AUM). They are graded from AAA to D while those taking no action are rated X.
Investors that recognise climate risk are taking significantly more action than last year, the report reveals. The leaders, rated A to AAA, have grown 29 per cent from 24 to 31 investors with $2.7 trillion AUM. On average, these 12 AAA-rated institutions have outperformed the benchmark return over five years, demonstrating that climate risk can be managed without sacrificing returns.
The Global Climate 500 Index is the world standard for assessing the success of asset owners at managing climate risk. It evaluates them on three approaches: tackling risks associated with high-carbon assets in their portfolios, engaging with the companies they own and with stakeholders throughout the investment chain to reduce climate risk, and investing in low-carbon assets.
This year AODP has raised the bar, requiring evidence of tangible action and no longer scores purely for transparency or commitments.
Ten per cent of asset owners and 74 per cent of the leaders group (rated A to AAA) are measuring carbon in their portfolios, up from seven per cent and 67 per cent last year. However, only two per cent of asset owners have declared a target for reducing portfolio carbon next year.
Just five per cent of asset owners and only half the leaders disclose that they are measuring the impact that stranded assets may have on their investments – although this is an improvement on the three per cent last year. This indicates that more complex risk management activities are often the last to be implemented.
Thirteen per cent of asset owners and 97% of leaders now have staff dedicated to integrating climate risk management into the investment process, up from 9 per cent and 79% last year.
Support for shareholder resolutions on climate change has grown strongly, with 12 per cent of investors voting in favour of at least one, compared with seven per cent last year. Among leaders support grew from 67 per cent to 84 per cent.
Low-carbon investment grew 63 per cent from $85 billion to $138 billion. General lack of disclosure and difficulties defining low-carbon assets mean this is likely to be an underestimate but funds are working to define this better for next year.
The Netherlands is the most active country by far with $39 billion invested in low-carbon. The UK’s Environment Agency Pension Fund has 26 per cent of its portfolio in low carbon assets, the highest in the index.
Mark Carney, Governor of the Bank of England and chairman of the international Financial Stability Board (FSB), has warned that climate change action could make huge reserves of coal, oil and gas unburnable stranded assets threatening investors with huge losses and destabilising markets.
The FSB has set up a task force to recommend how asset owners and other financial intermediaries should report the potential impact of climate change on their bottom line.
Christiana Figueres, Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), said: “The Paris Agreement has set out the path, direction and ultimate destination for the global economy. Increasing numbers of asset owners understand this and more are coming to that realization. I would encourage all of them to pick up the pace and ramp up their ambition in respect to a low carbon transition—it is the key to reducing risk and securing the health of their portfolios now and over the long term.”
The $4 billion Environment Agency Pension Fund tops the Global Climate 500 Index closely followed by Australia’s $7.1 billion Local Government Super, each coming top or second in all three categories and proving that size is no barrier to managing climate risk.
Other leaders include giant institutions which have been active in campaigning for climate action, $391 billion Dutch pension fund ABP and the $301 billion California Public Employees Retirement System, both rated AAA, and UK insurer Aviva with $445 billion of assets, rated A.
Frances’s £180 billion Caisse des Dépôts has jumped from a CC rating to a AA, while and $51 billion Swedish pension fund AMF and the UK’s $26 billion Greater Manchester Pension Fund are both up from D to A.
Scandinavian asset owners are taking the most action to manage climate risk. Sweden tops the Country Index, followed by Norway, and Denmark comes fifth. France, where the Paris Climate Summit brought climate risk into sharp focus, takes fourth place with three funds in the top 20 for the first time.
Pension funds account for nearly two thirds of the index and insurers nearly a quarter. However, only four of the seven countries that dominate the global pensions market make the top ten in the Country Index. Australia are third, the Netherlands sixth, the UK seventh and the US ninth and all are well represented in the leadership group of institutions rated A to AAA. Canada ranks 11th, Switzerland 14th and Japan 25th.
Japan’s Government Pension Investment Fund, the world’s largest asset owner worth $1.2 trillion, is rated D, up from X last year. It has committed to taking environmental, social and governance factors into account in its investments and has started asking its asset managers what they are doing to promote better behaviour in the companies it owns.
Julian Poulter added: “Asset owners in Japan and Switzerland have shown no leadership on climate change and are putting their members and clients at risk. It is the countries with more transparent financial systems where asset owners are more accountable to their members where we are seeing most action.
“This makes it significant that GPIF, the world’s largest asset owner, has taken the first step on the journey to protecting millions of Japanese pension holders from the risks of climate change. We look forward to further action and we hope it will send a signal to a market which has been ignoring the issue for far too long.”
The World Bank has been a leading voice warning about climate risk and high carbon investment, but the report reveals that its $17 billion Group Staff Retirement fund is not translating this into strong action. It is rated D, up from X in 2015. By contrast the UN’s $52 billion Joint Staff Pension Fund is up from A to AA.
The ten biggest X-rated funds, worth a total $4.9 trillion, include sovereign wealth funds in the oil states of Abu Dhabi, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Qatar as well as China and Hong Kong, insurance companies China Life, Japan Post and Zenkyoren of Japan, and the US pension fund, Thrift Savings Plan.
Like our Facebook Page
Guide to Creating an Eco-Friendly Forex Trading Strategy
Why Spain Is One Europe’s Most Sustainable Places to Go
8 Top Green Business Ideas For A Sustainable Future
5 Harmful Effects Smoking Has on the Environment
Eco-Friendly Traveler’s Guide to Enjoying Denali National Park
Hazardous Waste Management is a Crucial Business Practice
Health and Environmental Benefits of “Organic” Baby Formula
7 Ways to Make Your Business Premises Greener
Can Eco-Friendly Businesses Diversify with Crypto Investing?
Is It The Right Time To Switch To An Electric Vehicle?
5 Huge Support Tips for Eco-friendly eCommerce Brands
Harnessing Sustainability with User-Centric Technology Innovation
10 Ingenious Ways To Make Your Home More Eco-Friendly
4 Great Improvements for Green & Energy Efficient Homes
Signs and Causes of Water Contamination We Must All Recognize
Can Eco-Friendly Businesses Diversify with Crypto Investing?
5 Great Tips to Eat Sustainably & Lower Your Environmental Impact
Top Cities for Green Businesses Looking to Expand in China
Project Management Software is Essential for Green Businesses
How Can We Increase the Use of Renewable Energy?
- Energy4 months ago
How To Choose the Right Solar Inverter for Your Home?
- Energy4 months ago
How to Choose the Best Solar Panel for Your Home
- Environment11 months ago
Importance of Using a Water Purifier in an Area with High Pollution
- Environment4 months ago
Reduce Industry Footprints with Sustainable Material Swaps