The National Trust has reaffirmed its current stance against fracking, after its director-general told the Times that the charity had an “open mind” about the technology.
The newspaper reported on Thursday that Dame Helen Ghosh said the Trust would consider allowing shale gas extraction on its land, if potential environmental threats were nullified.
This contrasts with the Trust’s current position on the activity.
Speaking to Blue & Green Tomorrow, a spokesperson for the charity said more needed to be done in terms of evidential research and technology before it would even consider allowing fracking on its sites.
“As it stands, if an application was made to frack on one of our sites, we would oppose it”, they said.
The Trust said back in August that they had a “presumption” against fracking, because it “gives rise to potential environmental and landscape impacts”. The spokesperson said the Trust stands by this stance at present.
Ghosh told the Times, “We all have yet to see what the surface environmental impact of fracking is and when we have seen it then we would reach a view about whether [we would object to it] adjacent to National Trust land or on National Trust land.”
The Trust’s opposition to fracking was made clear during the Balcombe protests in Sussex, where demonstrators raised concerns over environmental safety after drilling firm Cuadrilla started “exploratory drilling”.
A report issued at the beginning of October put forward evidence to suggest that fracking poses a “serious threat” of water contamination.
During the protests at Balcombe, Green party MP Caroline Lucas was arrested by police officers for her part in the protests, and was subsequently charged with “wilful obstruction of the highway” by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) in September.
Lucas defended her actions at the Green party conference, saying that “big [businesses were ignoring] local democracy and [trashing] our natural environment at will”.
The National Trust does not currently allow wind farms to be built on its land due to the visual implications of the turbines, but the spokesperson added that they have a “duty to protect beautiful places”.
They also said, “We have a target to generate 50% of our own energy from renewables by 2020, including wind where it is not too large for its setting. We’re trying to show how this can be done without putting at risk our beautiful natural and built heritage”.
Like our Facebook Page
How to Recycle Books: 7 Easy Steps
How to Raise Money for Your Non-Profit or Charity: 7 Steps to Take
Solar-Powered Solutions for Lowering City Infrastructure Carbon Footprint
How to Prioritize Sustainability When Studying Abroad
EHS Management is Making the Construction Industry Greener
Best Sustainable Practices in the Construction Industry in 2024
Comparing Renewable Energy: Solar Power, Wind, Hydro & Bio
Maximizing Home Efficiency: The Renewable Way
10 Easy Ways To Make Your Home More Eco-Friendly
Energy Management Mastery: 4 Tips for Green Property Owners
Insider Tips for an Eco-Friendly Dubai Vacation in 2024
Polythene Bags and Food Safety: Crucial Role in Food Packaging
5 Tips for Creating a Sustainable Living Space
Solo Eco-Tourism Misconceptions That Need To Be Debunked
Embracing Sustainability: 7 Tips for Eco-Friendly Shopping
Crypto Market Makers Are Becoming More Eco-Friendly
Eco-Friendly Benefits of Energy Efficient Mortgages
Experience Thailand at Sea Yacht Chartering as an Eco-Tourist
5 Reasons Eco-Tourists Should Plan a Barcelona Getaway
Ocean Stewardship: The New Frontier for Charitable Giving
- Features8 months ago
What is the Eco-Friendliest Option to Wash Your Dishes?
- Environment12 months ago
6 Home Improvements You Can Make to Help the Environment
- Editors Choice11 months ago
7 Tips to Minimize the Negative Impact Businesses Have on the Environment
- Environment12 months ago
The Truth About The Environmental Impact of Dogs