Connect with us


Sustainable and ethical investors honoured at Investment Week Awards



Alliance Trust Investments, Impax Asset Management and Triodos Bank were among the winners at the Environment, Ethical, Social & Governance (ESG) Investment Awards on Tuesday.

Now in its fifth year, the event – hosted by Investment Week in London – honours investment funds with an ethical, environmental, social or sustainability focus.

Chair of the judging panel Deborah Benn commented that fund performance was a “welcome factor” across the 2013 shortlist, saying that the financial returns from many entrant funds had matched or bettered the mainstream.

This chimes well with research published in August by, which found that ethical and sustainable investment funds had generally outperformed conventional ones in the past 12 months.

Benn added, “It not only showcases the investment potential of the sector, but firmly puts environmental, ethical and social investment funds in the mainstream.”

Among the winners on the night was Alliance Trust Investments, which won Best New Entrant after acquiring Aviva Investors’ sustainable and responsible investment (SRI) team at the beginning of the year.

We are delighted to be recognised at our new home, Alliance Trust Investments, and to be able to continue managing the Sustainable Future funds in the same way that we have been doing so for over a decade”, said SRI analyst Mike Appleby.

There is tough competition in this growing and innovative area of investing, so full credit goes to Alliance Trust Investments for seeing the value in sustainable investing and in keeping the Sustainable Future funds alive so we are able to continue to attract more investments from clients with similar values to our own.”

Sustainable bank Triodos won Best Social Impact Investor, after having launched a series of successful bonds for charities and socially-focused businesses in the past 12 months. These include a £5m bond for nursing and dementia and a £5m bond to boost London’s Olympic legacy through the development of sport and leisure facilities.

Also honoured was Impax Asset Management, whose Environmental Markets fund took home the gong in the Best Environmental Fund category.

Impax’s head of distribution Ominder Dhillon said, “With around 1,400 companies in the universe, we have been able to demonstrate that a well-diversified global portfolio of companies focused on resource efficiency managed by a specialist team can generate returns that are attractive to all investors.

We are currently positive on many of the 23 sectors in which the fund invests although water and energy efficiency remain the largest exposures. Over the year to date, the fund has outperformed global indices and returned 30.7%.  Investors are increasingly recognising the long-term growth potential of the strategy as well as the opportune timing to hedge environmental or climate related risks.”

The Peterborough social impact bond – set up in 2010 to provide support to short-term prisoners in Peterborough – and the Carbon Tracker Initiative – whose research into stranded assets has underpinned the fossil fuel divestment movement – also took home awards.

A full list of winners can be found below.

Best Water, Food, Agriculture & Forestry Fund

Pictet Water – Winner

Robeco SAM Sustainable Water Fund – Highly Commended

Best Clean Energy Fund

Vontobel Fund – New Power – Winner

Pictet Clean Energy – Highly Commended

Best Ethical Investment Fund

Kames Ethical Equity Fund – Winner

Ecclesiastical Amity UK Fund – Highly Commended

Best Environmental Fund

Impax Environmental Markets – Winner

IM WHEB Sustainability Fund – Highly Commended

Best Environmental Fund Management Group

Pictet Asset Management – Winner

Vontobel Asset Management – Highly Commended

Best Social Impact Bond

Peterborough SIB (Criminal Justice) – Winner

Scope SIB (Disability) – Highly Commended

Best Social Impact Investor

Triodos Bank – Winner

Big Society Capital – Highly Commended

Award for Innovation

Carbon Tracker (Wasted Capital and Stranded Assets report) – Winner

Active Earth Systematic Quality Investment (SQI) Process – Highly Commended

Best Investment Project

The IFC China Utility-based Energy Efficiency Finance (CHUEE) Programme – Winner

Purification in Africa – Highly Commended

Best New Entrant

Alliance Trust Investments (new team) – Winner

BNP Paribas L1 Aqua (new fund) – Highly Commended

Further reading:

Financial returns from ethical investment funds ‘better than mainstream’ in last 12 months

Environmentally-friendly stocks outperforming the market

Ecclesiastical scoops ethical investment gong for fifth consecutive year

Best ethical investment funds named at Money Observer Fund Awards 2013

Talking about sustainable finance: the FT/IFC conference


Will Self-Driving Cars Be Better for the Environment?



self-driving cars for green environment
Shutterstock Licensed Photo - By Zapp2Photo |

Technologists, engineers, lawmakers, and the general public have been excitedly debating about the merits of self-driving cars for the past several years, as companies like Waymo and Uber race to get the first fully autonomous vehicles on the market. Largely, the concerns have been about safety and ethics; is a self-driving car really capable of eliminating the human errors responsible for the majority of vehicular accidents? And if so, who’s responsible for programming life-or-death decisions, and who’s held liable in the event of an accident?

But while these questions continue being debated, protecting people on an individual level, it’s worth posing a different question: how will self-driving cars impact the environment?

The Big Picture

The Department of Energy attempted to answer this question in clear terms, using scientific research and existing data sets to project the short-term and long-term environmental impact that self-driving vehicles could have. Its findings? The emergence of self-driving vehicles could essentially go either way; it could reduce energy consumption in transportation by as much as 90 percent, or increase it by more than 200 percent.

That’s a margin of error so wide it might as well be a total guess, but there are too many unknown variables to form a solid conclusion. There are many ways autonomous vehicles could influence our energy consumption and environmental impact, and they could go well or poorly, depending on how they’re adopted.

Driver Reduction?

One of the big selling points of autonomous vehicles is their capacity to reduce the total number of vehicles—and human drivers—on the road. If you’re able to carpool to work in a self-driving vehicle, or rely on autonomous public transportation, you’ll spend far less time, money, and energy on your own car. The convenience and efficiency of autonomous vehicles would therefore reduce the total miles driven, and significantly reduce carbon emissions.

There’s a flip side to this argument, however. If autonomous vehicles are far more convenient and less expensive than previous means of travel, it could be an incentive for people to travel more frequently, or drive to more destinations they’d otherwise avoid. In this case, the total miles driven could actually increase with the rise of self-driving cars.

As an added consideration, the increase or decrease in drivers on the road could result in more or fewer vehicle collisions, respectively—especially in the early days of autonomous vehicle adoption, when so many human drivers are still on the road. Car accident injury cases, therefore, would become far more complicated, and the roads could be temporarily less safe.


Deadheading is a term used in trucking and ridesharing to refer to miles driven with an empty load. Assume for a moment that there’s a fleet of self-driving vehicles available to pick people up and carry them to their destinations. It’s a convenient service, but by necessity, these vehicles will spend at least some of their time driving without passengers, whether it’s spent waiting to pick someone up or en route to their location. The increase in miles from deadheading could nullify the potential benefits of people driving fewer total miles, or add to the damage done by their increased mileage.

Make and Model of Car

Much will also depend on the types of cars equipped to be self-driving. For example, Waymo recently launched a wave of self-driving hybrid minivans, capable of getting far better mileage than a gas-only vehicle. If the majority of self-driving cars are electric or hybrids, the environmental impact will be much lower than if they’re converted from existing vehicles. Good emissions ratings are also important here.

On the other hand, the increased demand for autonomous vehicles could put more pressure on factory production, and make older cars obsolete. In that case, the gas mileage savings could be counteracted by the increased environmental impact of factory production.

The Bottom Line

Right now, there are too many unanswered questions to make a confident determination whether self-driving vehicles will help or harm the environment. Will we start driving more, or less? How will they handle dead time? What kind of models are going to be on the road?

Engineers and the general public are in complete control of how this develops in the near future. Hopefully, we’ll be able to see all the safety benefits of having autonomous vehicles on the road, but without any of the extra environmental impact to deal with.

Continue Reading


New Zealand to Switch to Fully Renewable Energy by 2035



renewable energy policy
Shutterstock Licensed Photo - By Eviart /

New Zealand’s prime minister-elect Jacinda Ardern is already taking steps towards reducing the country’s carbon footprint. She signed a coalition deal with NZ First in October, aiming to generate 100% of the country’s energy from renewable sources by 2035.

New Zealand is already one of the greenest countries in the world, sourcing over 80% of its energy for its 4.7 million people from renewable resources like hydroelectric, geothermal and wind. The majority of its electricity comes from hydro-power, which generated 60% of the country’s energy in 2016. Last winter, renewable generation peaked at 93%.

Now, Ardern is taking on the challenge of eliminating New Zealand’s remaining use of fossil fuels. One of the biggest obstacles will be filling in the gap left by hydropower sources during dry conditions. When lake levels drop, the country relies on gas and coal to provide energy. Eliminating fossil fuels will require finding an alternative source to avoid spikes in energy costs during droughts.

Business NZ’s executive director John Carnegie told Bloomberg he believes Ardern needs to balance her goals with affordability, stating, “It’s completely appropriate to have a focus on reducing carbon emissions, but there needs to be an open and transparent public conversation about the policies and how they are delivered.”

The coalition deal outlined a few steps towards achieving this, including investing more in solar, which currently only provides 0.1% of the country’s energy. Ardern’s plans also include switching the electricity grid to renewable energy, investing more funds into rail transport, and switching all government vehicles to green fuel within a decade.

Zero net emissions by 2050

Beyond powering the country’s electricity grid with 100% green energy, Ardern also wants to reach zero net emissions by 2050. This ambitious goal is very much in line with her focus on climate change throughout the course of her campaign. Environmental issues were one of her top priorities from the start, which increased her appeal with young voters and helped her become one of the youngest world leaders at only 37.

Reaching zero net emissions would require overcoming challenging issues like eliminating fossil fuels in vehicles. Ardern hasn’t outlined a plan for reaching this goal, but has suggested creating an independent commission to aid in the transition to a lower carbon economy.

She also set a goal of doubling the number of trees the country plants per year to 100 million, a goal she says is “absolutely achievable” using land that is marginal for farming animals.

Greenpeace New Zealand climate and energy campaigner Amanda Larsson believes that phasing out fossil fuels should be a priority for the new prime minister. She says that in order to reach zero net emissions, Ardern “must prioritize closing down coal, putting a moratorium on new fossil fuel plants, building more wind infrastructure, and opening the playing field for household and community solar.”

A worldwide shift to renewable energy

Addressing climate change is becoming more of a priority around the world and many governments are assessing how they can reduce their reliance on fossil fuels and switch to environmentally-friendly energy sources. Sustainable energy is becoming an increasingly profitable industry, giving companies more of an incentive to invest.

Ardern isn’t alone in her climate concerns, as other prominent world leaders like Justin Trudeau and Emmanuel Macron have made renewable energy a focus of their campaigns. She isn’t the first to set ambitious goals, either. Sweden and Norway share New Zealand’s goal of net zero emissions by 2045 and 2030, respectively.

Scotland already sources more than half of its electricity from renewable sources and aims to fully transition by 2020, while France announced plans in September to stop fossil fuel production by 2040. This would make it the first country to do so, and the first to end the sale of gasoline and diesel vehicles.

Many parts of the world still rely heavily on coal, but if these countries are successful in phasing out fossil fuels and transitioning to renewable resources, it could serve as a turning point. As other world leaders see that switching to sustainable energy is possible – and profitable – it could be the start of a worldwide shift towards environmentally-friendly energy.


Continue Reading