Connect with us


Investment in water is a “first necessity”

March 22 is World Water Day, an annual event that advocates global sustainable water management and raises awareness of the planet’s ever-increasing requirement for clean water.

Earlier this month, Blue & Green Tomorrow spoke to Peter Boonman, director of water and sanitation charity, Pump Aid, following the announcement that Millennium Development Goal on safe drinking water had been met five years early.



March 22 is World Water Day, an annual event that advocates global sustainable water management and raises awareness of the planet’s ever-increasing requirement for clean water.

Earlier this month, Blue & Green Tomorrow spoke to Peter Boonman, director of water and sanitation charity, Pump Aid, following the announcement that Millennium Development Goal on safe drinking water had been met five years early.

Whilst on the face of it positive news, the fact remains that 11% of the world – some 783 million people – still don’t have access to water, whilst a massive 2.5 billion lack basic sanitation.

We caught up again with Boonman, who explained the severity and urgency of the situation.

The Earth is full of water, but only a very small part of it is drinkable”, he explains.

The need for water is growing very fast, both through the growth in population and through industries. If you compare that with 100 or 200 years ago, we are using so much more water.

The availability of water hasn’t increased, and I think added to that climate change is maybe even decreasing it.

On a global scale, I think if you look at industries like mining, they use huge quantities of water, and the water that’s used for that is actually drinking water.”

The aim World Water Day is not only to highlight the problem, but also to seek a solution.

World Water Day is about getting consumers engaged and interested, because the majority of people just absolutely take for granted that we’ve got access to clean, safe drinking water in many formats, whether it’s at home turning the tap on, sanitation facilities, or being able to just stretch out your arm to the nearest shop to buy a bottle”, says Karen Lynch, CEO of Belu, a company that sells environmentally-friendly bottled water.

For us, we’re using today to raise awareness of the fact that it couldn’t be more different on the other side of the planet, and that Belu offers a chance for people to get involved.”

Duncan Goose, founder of The One Brand, also spoke to B&GT. He has seen first-hand the poor standard of living in developing nations, and highlighted the need for increased investment in water projects.

Having just returned from Northern Kenya, which witnessed the worst drought in 60 years, impacting on 13 millio people and causing 100,000 deaths, I feel that the £1m we invested in clean water projects in the region last year was just scratching the surface of what’s required there”, he says.

To see the impact of lack of water on communities, which has resulted in failed crops, goat herds decimated, massacres and babies surviving on medical aid, is tragic and a wakeup call for the world.

With news coming in of a similar situation building across the Sahel region, how many lives must we see lost before governments intervene?

Water is life. The implications of a lack of water are simply horrific.

19 employees of The One Brand marched across Waterloo Bridge in London, carrying the company's daily water supply in brightly-coloured buckets above their heads, to highlight the scale of water usage worldwide.

B&GT has profiled several ethical or sustainable funds in the past few months – many of which directly invest in technologies or companies that are actively battling to provide clean water for all.

One such fund is the Cheviot Climate Assets Fund, and Claudia Quiroz is its manager.

Water is becoming scarcer and more polluted from animal and human waste, industrial processes and the use of pesticides and other chemicals”, she explains.

From an investment point of view, that means that we at Cheviot focus on investing in companies providing solutions to the water scarcity and availability problem.

For example, Geberit, a Switzerland based company, is a manufacturer of pipes, piping and flushing systems for the residential and commercial sectors.

This company is well positioned to benefit from increasing adoption of water conservation technologies in both residential and commercial buildings as well as a cycle recovery in the housing and construction market.”

Boonman of Pump Aid echoed Quiroz’s sentiments, and began by quoting the 2010 Liberia Wash Consortium.

Access to clean water and sanitation underpins community development”, he relays. “It’s estimated that for every pound spent on improving water and sanitation, at least nine pounds is made or saved on costs related to health, education and social and economic development.”

He expanded by listing just some of the huge advantages reaped from water investment – some of which were vital ingredients for life, but most of which we, in the Western world, take for granted.

If you invest in water, you help health, you help economic development, you help women and girls, you help children access education and you help with food security. You help so many basic needs, that investment in clean water and sanitation becomes a no-brainer, a first necessity.”

It’s not just the Cheviot Climate Assets Fund that allows investors the chance to help fight the water battle. Other funds, such as the Skandia Ethical Fund, and the IM WHEB Sustainability Fund, also invest in such technologies and companies.

We can help you pick others – you just have to fill in our online form – or you can ask your IFA.

Related links:

Safe drinking water goal achieved, but not in most deprived areas

As the developed world struggles with their economic crisis, our corporate giants turn to developing countries

Water management behind climate change on boardroom agenda

Future water demand will outstrip supply

Invest sustainably now, and sector growth will ensure big rewards

Picture sources: Arsenie Coseac and The One Brand.


Two Ancient Japanese Philosophies Are the Future of Eco-Living



Shutterstock Photos - By Syda Productions |

Our obsession with all things new has blighted the planet. We have a waste crisis, particularly when it comes to plastic. US scientists have calculated the total amount of plastic ever made – 8.3 billion tons! Unfortunately, only 9% of this is estimated to have been recycled. And current global trends point to there being 12 billion tons of plastic waste by 2050.

However, two ancient Japanese philosophies are providing an antidote to the excesses of modern life. By emphasizing the elimination of waste and the acceptance of the old and imperfect, the concepts of Mottainai and Wabi-Sabi have positively influenced Japanese life for centuries.

They are now making their way into the consciousness of the Western mainstream, with an increasing influence in the UK and US. By encouraging us to be frugal with our possessions, (i.e. using natural materials for interior design) these concepts can be the future of eco-living.

What is Wabi-Sabi and Mottainai??

Wabi-Sabi emphasizes an acceptance of transience and imperfection. Although Wabi had the original meaning of sad and lonely, it has come to describe those that are simple, unmaterialistic and at one with nature. The term Sabi is defined as the “the bloom of time”, and has evolved into a new meaning: taking pleasure and seeing beauty in things that are old and faded. 

Any flaws in objects, like cracks or marks, are cherished because they illustrate the passage of time. Wear and tear is seen as a representation of their loving use. This makes it intrinsically linked to Wabi, due to its emphasis on simplicity and rejection of materialism.

In the West, Wabi-Sabi has infiltrated many elements of daily life, from cuisine to interior design. Specialist Japanese homeware companies, like Sansho, source handmade products that embody the Wabi-Sabi philosophy. Their products, largely made from natural materials, are handcrafted by traditional Japanese artisans – meaning no two pieces are the same and no two pieces are “perfect” in size or shape.


Mottainai is a term expressing a feeling of regret concerning waste, translating roughly in English to either “what a waste!” or “Don’t waste!”. The philosophy emphasizes the intrinsic value of a resource or object, and is linked to hinto animism, the notion that all objects have a spirit, or ‘kami’. The idea that we are part of nature is a key part of Japanese psychology.

Mottainai also has origins in Buddhist philosophy. The Buddhist monastic tradition emphasizes a life of frugality, to allow us to concentrate on attaining enlightenment. It is from this move towards frugality that a link to Mottainai as a concept of waste can be made.

How have Wabi-Sabi and Mottainai promoted eco living?

Wabi-Sabi is still a prominent feature of Japanese life today, and has remained instrumental in the way people design their homes. The ideas of imperfection and frugality are hugely influential.

For example, instead of buying a brand-new kitchen table, many Japanese people instead retain a table that has been passed through the generations. Although its long use can be seen by various marks and scratches, Wabi-Sabi has taught people that they should value it because of its imperfect nature. Those scratches and marks are a story and signify the passage of time. This is a far cry from what we typically associate with the Western World.

Like Wabi Sabi, Mottainai is manifested throughout Japanese life, creating a great respect for Japanese resources. This has had a major impact on home design. For example, the Japanese prefer natural materials in their homes, such as using soil and dried grass as thermal insulation.

Their influence in the UK

The UK appears to be increasingly influenced by thes two concepts. Some new reports indicate that Wabi Sabi has been labelled as ‘the trend of 2018’. For example, Japanese ofuro baths inspired the project that won the New London Architecture’s 2017 Don’t Move, Improve award. Ofuro baths are smaller than typical baths, use less water, and are usually made out of natural materials, like hinoki wood.

Many other UK properties have also been influenced by these philosophies, such as natural Kebony wood being applied to the external cladding of a Victorian property in Hampstead; or a house in Lancaster Gate using rice paper partitions as sub-dividers. These examples embody the spirit of both philosophies. They are representative of Mottainai because of their use of natural resources to discourage waste. And they’re reflective of Wabi-Sabi because they accept imperfect materials that have not been engineered or modified.

In a world that is plagued by mass over-consumption and an incessant need for novelty, the ancient concepts of Mottainai and Wabi-Sabi provide a blueprint for living a more sustainable life. They help us to reduce consumption and put less of a strain on the planet. This refreshing mindset can help us transform the way we go about our day to day lives.

Continue Reading


What Should We Make of The Clean Growth Strategy?



Clean Growth Strategy for green energy
Shutterstock Licensed Photo - By sdecoret |

It was hardly surprising the Clean Growth Strategy (CGS) was much anticipated by industry and environmentalists. After all, its publication was pushed back a couple of times. But with the document now in the public domain, and the Government having run a consultation on its content, what ultimately should we make of what’s perhaps one of the most important publications to come out of the Department for Business, Energy and the Industrial Strategy (BEIS) in the past 12 months?

The starting point, inevitably, is to decide what the document is and isn’t. It is, certainly, a lengthy and considered direction-setter – not just for the Government, but for business and industry, and indeed for consumers. While much of the content was favourably received in terms of highlighting ways to ensure clean growth, critics – not unjustifiably – suggested it was long on pages but short on detailed and finite policy commitments, accompanied by clear timeframes for action.

A Strategy, Instead of a Plan

But should we really be surprised? The answer, in all honesty, is probably not really. BEIS ministers had made no secret of the fact they would be publishing a ‘strategy’ as opposed to a ‘plan,’ and that gave every indication the CGS would set a direction of travel and be largely aspirational. The Government had consulted on its content, and will likely respond to the consultation during the course of 2018. And that’s when we might see more defined policy commitments and timeframes from action.

The second criticism one might level at the CGS is that indicated the use of ‘flexibilities’ to achieve targets set in the carbon budgets – essentially using past results to offset more recent failings to keep pace with emissions targets. Claire Perry has since appeared in front of the BEIS Select Committee and insisted she would be personally disappointed if the UK used flexibilities to fill the shortfall in meeting the fourth and fifth carbon budgets, but this is difficult ground for the Government. The Committee on Climate Change was critical of the proposed use of efficiencies, which would somewhat undermine ministers’ good intentions and commitment to clean growth – particularly set against November’s Budget, in which the Chancellor maintained the current carbon price floor (potentially giving a reprieve to coal) and introduced tax changes favourable to North Sea oil producers.

A 12 Month Green Energy Initiative with Real Teeth

But, there is much to appreciate and commend about the CGS. It fits into a 12-month narrative for BEIS ministers, in which they have clearly shown a commitment to clean growth, improving energy efficiency and cutting carbon emissions. Those 12 months have seen the launch of the Industrial Strategy – firstly in Green Paper form, which led to the launch of the Faraday Challenge, and then a White Paper in which clean growth was considered a ‘grand challenge’ for government. Throughout these publications – and indeed again with the CGS – the Government has shown itself to be an advocate of smart systems and demand response, including the development of battery technology.

Electrical Storage Development at Center of Broader Green Energy Push

While the Faraday Challenge is primarily focused on the development of batteries to support the proliferation of electric vehicles (which will support cuts to carbon emissions), it will also drive down technology costs, supporting the deployment of small and utility-scale storage that will fully harness the capability of renewables. Solar and wind made record contributions to UK electricity generation in 2017, and the development of storage capacity will help both reduce consumer costs and support decarbonisation.

The other thing the CGS showed us it that the Government is happy to be a disrupter in the energy market. The headline from the publication was the plans for legislation to empower Ofgem to cap the costs of Standard Variable Tariffs. This had been an aspiration of ministers for months, and there’s little doubt that driving down costs for consumers will be a trend within BEIS policy throughout 2018.

But the Government also seems happy to support disruption in the renewables market, as evidenced by the commitment (in the CGS) to more than half a billion pounds of investment in Pot 2 of Contracts for Difference (CfDs) – where the focus will be on emerging rather than established technologies.

This inevitably prompted ire from some within the industry, particularly proponents of solar, which is making an increasing contribution to the UK’s energy mix. But, again, we shouldn’t really be surprised. Since the subsidy cuts of 2015, ministers have given no indication or cause to think there will be public money afforded to solar development. Including solar within the CfD auction would have been a seismic shift in policy. And while ministers’ insistence in subsidy-free solar as the way forward has been shown to be based on a single project, we should expect that as costs continue to be driven down and solar makes record contributions to electricity generation, investment will follow – and there will ultimately be more subsidy-free solar farms, albeit perhaps not in 2018.

Meanwhile, by promoting emerging technologies like remote island wind, the Government appears to be favouring diversification and that it has a range of resources available to meet consumer demand. Perhaps more prescient than the decision to exclude established renewables from the CfD auction is the subsequent confirmation in the budget that Pot 2 of CfDs will be the last commitment of public money to renewable energy before 2025.

In short, we should view the CGS as a step in the right direction, albeit one the Government should be elaborating on in its consultation response. Its publication, coupled with the advancement this year of the Industrial Strategy indicates ministers are committed to the clean growth agenda. The question is now how the aspirations set out in the CGS – including the development of demand response capacity for the grid, and improving the energy efficiency of commercial and residential premises – will be realised.

It’s a step in the right direction. But, inevitably, there’s much more work to do.

Continue Reading