Leading economists are failing to account for ecosystem services such as climate change, water scarcity and pollinator fall off, because of the inherent short-term nature of markets, says a new report.
Researchers at Alliance Trust Investments, Newton Investment Management and Schroders heard from several chief economists from some of the largest investment banks in the world, about the level at which they were integrating ecosystem changes.
Interviewees noted the “shortcomings in the ability of existing economic models to readily incorporate ecosystem service impacts”.
“As the visibility of changes to ecosystem services continues to increase on a global level, from the drought in the US to the smog of Beijing, there is increasing recognition that the outcomes of these changes are having material economic impacts”, the report’s executive summary reads.
“The evidence may emerge quickly through visible indicators, such as rising crop prices, or gradually through less immediately tangible indicators, such as declining health.”
The study, called Broken Models? Economics and Ecosystem Services, says that there is a “noticeable absence within economic forecasts […] of the consequences of changes to ecosystem services […] on these forecasts.”
Indeed, in 2011, Schroders sent a short survey to the chief economists from 14 investment banks. One of the responses it received simply said, “The subject is too big to meaningfully contemplate.”
A year later, after teaming up with Alliance Trust and Newton, Schroders posed a set of six questions to chief economists from UBS, HSBC and Goldman Sachs, among other large investment banks.
According to the report, their responses suggested a significant obstacle for the economists: “the demand for very short-term focussed work, [which constrained] their ability to produce long-term investment perspectives.”
The report concludes that investors who look to the longer term, and who account for the ramifications of ecosystem changes, will be better placed to mitigate risk in the future.
A report by a network of institutional investors recently outlined how climate change and extreme weather conditions posed huge risks to investors, so mitigation strategies were necessary to avoid future losses.
Like our Facebook Page
How to Find an Eco-Friendly Termite Control Service Provider in Malaysia
Eco-Friendly Vegans Win Most Battles Not the War
3 Iconic Chicago Billboards Eco-Friendly Advertisers Can Learn from
EnviroSolar’s Abe Issa Discusses Success in Green Entrepreneurship
How Sports Could Be Impacted by Climate Change
What Eco-Friendly Patients Should Know about Online Therapy
6 Reasons Why Meal Delivery Services are Eco-Friendly
The Path for Retail’s Sustainable Future
4 Eco-Friendly Ways to Treat a Sinus Infection
4 Strategies for Eco-Friendly Real Estate Investors to Find Properties
How Managed Print Services Helps to Reduce Paper Waste
Why Scientists Are Concerned About ‘Forever Chemicals’ In Drinking Water
Meat Farming Is Only Getting Smarter, Easier & Eco-Friendlier
What is Eco-Friendly Homesteading and How Does it Affect Your Insurance?
Importance of Using a Water Purifier in an Area with High Pollution
Alternative Financing Ideas for Green Businesses that Shun Banks
Tencel Material Demand Shows Britain Is More Eco-Friendlier Than Ireland
How To Invest in Clean Energy Stocks in Only Five Easy Steps!
How To Secure Funding As An Eco-Entrepreneur?
4 Amazing Eco-Friendly Businesses Worth Starting in 2021
- Features8 months ago
Seven Health and Safety Tips for Eco-Friendly Products in a Green Home
- Energy9 months ago
Eco-Friendly Homeowners Lower Carbon Footprints through Greater Air Conditioner Efficiency
- Features8 months ago
Essential Guidelines for Eco-friendly Moving into new Home
- Invest10 months ago
The Eco-Friendly Evolution of Bitcoin Over the Years