Investors in the US currently have an “incomplete picture” about how companies they invest in affect the political process, according to a new guide that aims to shed light on the issue.
Confronting Corporate Money in Politics, from the US SIF Foundation – a research body that forms part of the US Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment – argues such gaps in transparency could “erode public trust and investor confidence”.
It calls on investors to use their weight as shareholders to engage with companies on the issue – either by filing resolutions that are then voted on by all shareholders or by helping influence their fund manager’s vote.
“Public opinion polls confirm that the vast majority of Americans are concerned that there is too much money in politics and that companies should only spend money on political campaigns if they disclose their spending immediately”, said Lisa Woll, CEO of the US SIF Foundation.
“Responsible investors share their concerns, and believe that the companies in which they invest should report and be able to explain the rationale for their political expenditures with corporate funds.”
In the US, organisations are allowed to spend unlimited amounts for political means during election campaigns. According to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) – an independent regulator – $7 billion (£4.2 billion) was spent during the 2012 elections. The US Centre for Responsive Politics said the presidential election alone accounted for $2.6 billion (£1.6 billion) of this total.
In comparison, the last UK general election saw political parties and third party organisations spend £33.7m – down from £44m in 2005.
This is partly explained by the different electoral spending law in the UK. The Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act currently limits the amount third parties can spend in the year before an election. However, the transparency of lobbying, non-party campaigning and trade union administration bill – set to become law this year – aims to squeeze that spending cap even further.
The bill, labelled the ‘gagging law’, has received criticism from charities and campaign groups who argue it is rushed, badly designed and undemocratic.
The US SIF Foundation guide outlines some of the ways US investors – both individual and institutional – can speak out about the issue. It concludes that greater transparency from companies will give shareholders “a clear picture of corporate efforts to influence the political system”.
Like our Facebook Page
Tips To Become More Sustainable At Home
Modern Log Cabins: Sustainability and Aesthetics
The Basics of Starting a Eco-Friendly DIY Project
Importance of Shore Hardness for Sustainable Hobbyists
Green Healthcare Practice Patient Data Compliance Guidelines
Guidance on Trading Bitcoin as an Eco-Friendly Investor
The 5 Best Places for an Eco-Friendly Student Trip in Africa
The Importance of A Good Kitchen In an Eco-Friendly House
9 Zero Waste Gift Ideas For An Eco-Friendly 2021 Holiday
How to Source Sustainable and Healthy Food for Your Family
Why Making Your Business Sustainable Is More Important Than Ever
5 Essential Smart Building Systems for the 21st Century City
Investing in the Ethical and Eco-friendly Has Never Been Easier
The Most Popular Environment-Friendly Flooring Options
Five Ways to Make Your Bathroom More Sustainable
The Environmental Impact of Bitcoin Replacing Fiat Currencies
A Guide Transitioning to Safer and Environmentally-Friendly Chemicals
Role of HR in Sustainable Businesses
Tips To Make Air Conditioning Eco-Friendly
5 Reasons For Your Business To Go Green (Beyond Helping The Planet)
- Features9 months ago
Seven Health and Safety Tips for Eco-Friendly Products in a Green Home
- Energy10 months ago
Eco-Friendly Homeowners Lower Carbon Footprints through Greater Air Conditioner Efficiency
- Features9 months ago
Essential Guidelines for Eco-friendly Moving into new Home
- Invest12 months ago
The Eco-Friendly Evolution of Bitcoin Over the Years