The Wall Street Journal yesterday reported on a sudden but short-lived fall in the US stock market. This is a powerful demonstration of how fragile financial capitalism remains.
The WSJ wrote, “A tweet purportedly from the Associated Press just before 1:08pm reported two explosions in the White House and that president Barack Obama had been injured. The posting sent the Dow Jones Industrial Average tumbling roughly 145 points in an instant.”
Share trades are increasingly done automatically, at incredibly high frequencies*. Estimates put the volume as high as 50-73% of all US equity trading.
Share prices depend on sentiment, both positive and negative, and confidence, whether it’s rising or falling. The death/assassination or injury of the US president in his own home at the heart of the US capital would mean a certain amount of uncertainty and chaos; almost certainly war.
Investors tend to reduce their equity holdings at such times, as they are more volatile, and move their money into commodities that are less volatile. Economies, and economies at war, need raw materials.
Some bright spark identified social media as a good indicator of sentiment. Bad news often breaks first on Twitter. This includes news about companies. An explosion at the White House and injury to the president would create some pretty negative sentiment. It did, albeit briefly.
Automatic trading systems noticed the news of a White House attack and decided to dump stock.
Had there been a genuine explosion at the White House, the stock market would have fallen far more dramatically and for a longer period. Those who have sold first, before a crash, would be sitting pretty, able to sweep up lots of cheap stock. They reduce their loss and maximise their potential for gain.
Once AP issued a statement that their Twitter account had been hacked and the news was a hoax, the same high frequency process went into reverse and reversed the fall.
Many will argue this is a sign of the high frequency system’s resilience; some a clear warning sign of its vulnerability.
It should make policymakers and regulators pause for thought. If a determined and technologically able enemy wanted to hurt the US or other developed economies, tweeting negative rumours about companies might not be a bad strategy.
* Wikipedia defines High Frequency Trading as “the use of sophisticated technological tools and computer algorithms to trade securities on a rapid basis.” These trades are executed in micro-seconds (one millionth of a second).
Like our Facebook Page
Can You Use Your PC In an Eco-Friendly Manner?
How Pain Management Hurts the Environment, and What You Can Do to Help
4 Countries That Have Banned Single-Use Plastic
What Is Your Carbon Footprint and How Can You Reduce it?
How Business Leaders Can Positively Impact Water Scarcity
Plant-Based Protein Coffee is Eco-Friendly & Healthy
Eco-Friendly Restaurants That Are Bringing the Outside Inside
5 Environmental Benefits of Custom Manufacturing
How to Reduce the Carbon Footprint of Your Office
Benefits of Starting an Eco-Friendly eCommerce Business
Brian Sheth and Sheth Sangreal Foundation Donate $15 Million to Global Wildlife Conservation
Eco-Friendly Gardeners Can Make Compost from Organic Waste
8 Great Tips to Find an Eco-Conscious Moving Company
Can Employers Help the Planet with Work from Home Policies?
Creating a Green Basement Environment for a Healthier Home
Switching to an Electric Car to Help the Environment? Here’s How to Find the Cheapest Insurance
More People Are Practicing Eco-Conscious Lawn-Care
Choosing the Best Air Filter as Pollution Levels Worsen
9 Tips to Write Stellar Papers as an Environmental Science Major
Why You Need to Know These Hard Facts About Ethical Investing
- Energy3 months ago
How To Choose the Right Solar Inverter for Your Home?
- Energy3 months ago
How to Choose the Best Solar Panel for Your Home
- Environment10 months ago
Importance of Using a Water Purifier in an Area with High Pollution
- Environment3 months ago
Reduce Industry Footprints with Sustainable Material Swaps