Business secretary Vince Cable has warned the remuneration committees of FTSE 100 companies to curb excessive pay packages or risk further action. He argued that more sustainable deals and a focus on long-term goals were needed.
Cable’s comments come ahead of this year’s annual general meeting (AGM) season, which he said the government would be watching. He added that remuneration continued to be the focus of public debate and warned, “Unless business is seen to act responsible, pressure for further action will inevitably result.”
In a letter, Cable added, “I therefore trust that you will seize the opportunity to bring pay in line with performance.”
Previous research found that more than a third of executive directors at FTSE 100 companies have seen their pay and incentives rise at a quicker pace then company performance. The figures highlighted a lack of correlation between financial performance and remuneration packages in many cases.
Cable also added that remuneration should encourage long-term and sustainable growth rather than a focus on short-term gains.
The letter said, “Getting pay wrong damages popular trust in business, and undermines the duty to promote the long-term success of the company.
“I therefore think it vitally important that remuneration committees consider how remuneration policies can genuinely support sustainable value creation and avoid creating unwelcome incentive to focus excessively on short-term goals.”
The banking sector, and in particular Barclays, which will hold its AGM on Thursday, was singled out as having “dangerous levels” of pay. Cable called on the banks to listen to shareholder demands.
Barclays decided to increase it bonuses pool by 10% this year, despite profits falling by 32%. The increased led to increased tensions with shareholders, with some calling for change in the bank’s investment arm. The bank’s chief executive Antony Jenkins, who argued that bonus cutbacks in 2012 led to the business beginning to contract, defended the decision.
In 2012 there was a record number of remuneration reports being voted down by investors, suggesting that shareholders are willing to take action should they feel that pay packages do not represent a company’s performance.
Photo: Liberal Democrats via Flickr
Like our Facebook Page
Are Vegan Shoes A Sustainable Option?
How to Be More Eco-Conscious In Your Everyday Life
Tips To Become More Sustainable At Home
Modern Log Cabins: Sustainability and Aesthetics
The Basics of Starting a Eco-Friendly DIY Project
Importance of Shore Hardness for Sustainable Hobbyists
Green Healthcare Practice Patient Data Compliance Guidelines
Guidance on Trading Bitcoin as an Eco-Friendly Investor
The 5 Best Places for an Eco-Friendly Student Trip in Africa
The Importance of A Good Kitchen In an Eco-Friendly House
Why Making Your Business Sustainable Is More Important Than Ever
5 Essential Smart Building Systems for the 21st Century City
Investing in the Ethical and Eco-friendly Has Never Been Easier
The Most Popular Environment-Friendly Flooring Options
Five Ways to Make Your Bathroom More Sustainable
The Environmental Impact of Bitcoin Replacing Fiat Currencies
A Guide Transitioning to Safer and Environmentally-Friendly Chemicals
Role of HR in Sustainable Businesses
Tips To Make Air Conditioning Eco-Friendly
5 Reasons For Your Business To Go Green (Beyond Helping The Planet)
- Features9 months ago
Seven Health and Safety Tips for Eco-Friendly Products in a Green Home
- Energy10 months ago
Eco-Friendly Homeowners Lower Carbon Footprints through Greater Air Conditioner Efficiency
- Features9 months ago
Essential Guidelines for Eco-friendly Moving into new Home
- Invest12 months ago
The Eco-Friendly Evolution of Bitcoin Over the Years