Privacy settings

Choose whether optional services may connect to their providers. Your choice is stored on this device for up to 180 days. You can change or withdraw it here anytime.

When an optional service is enabled, its provider may receive your IP address and browser information. Read the full privacy and cookie notice and contact details before choosing. Read privacy and cookies · Contact

Ethical investment & sustainable living · since 2010 Sunday 15 November 2026
Ethical Investment and Sustainable Living The Brief

Search Blue & Green Tomorrow

Saved stories

0
Loading saved stories...

Follow Us

Environment
Desk position: Environment, centre

Church of England ethical investment arm to promote responsible GM investments

The Environment desk

The Church of England Ethical Investment Advisory Group (EIAG) has encouraged the church to take a “precautionary” stance on investments in genetic modification (GM).

In an update of its policy on investing in genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the EIAG claims that companies developing GMOs will have to meet strict “ethical standards” and satisfactory criteria, such as transparent communication, monitoring of the risks, good purposes and so on.

James Featherby, chair of the EIAG, said, “The EIAG recognises the potential benefits of responsibly-conducted GM such as pest resistance, vitamin supply, and improved resilience to drought, frost and saline conditions.

“We are also conscious that genetic modification represents a paradigm shift in plant and animal breeding and that there remain uncertainties about the effects of the application of the technology.

“The EIAG concluded that it is important that the investment practice of the national investing bodies should be consistent with a careful and precautionary approach to genetic modification.”

GMOs remain a matter of controversy in Europe and across the world. The main arguments brought by opponents are the excessive manipulation of nature and the huge power given to biotechnologies companies that have patented seeds, for example.

In 2000, the EIAG was advising church landowners not to consider GM trials on their farmland. However, its updated policy paves the way to the cultivation of “acceptable” and “already well-established” GM crops on land owned by the national investing bodies.

Further reading:

Renewed backing for GM crops

New Archbishop must lead on ethical investment

hurch to engage in “board level dialogue” over News Corporation investment

Found this useful? X LinkedIn
Behind this article

How we put this together

Written by
Blue & Green Tomorrow
Published
Sources
Primary reporting
Standards
About