Meat should be taxed to dissuade people from eating it, therefore reducing the environmental impact of farming livestock, scientists have said.
The digestive systems of ruminants – animals that ferment food in a specialised stomach prior to digesting it, such as sheep and cattle – are the biggest human-related source of methane emissions.
When released into the atmosphere, methane is a potent greenhouse gas, producing around 21 times as much warming as carbon dioxide.
Methane from livestock alone adds up to around 7.1 gigatonnes per year, or 14.5% of all human-caused greenhouse gas releases, according to the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation. Scientists have estimated that methane is responsible for 20% of the enhanced greenhouse effect.
In a new study, published on Friday in the journal Nature Climate Change, researchers suggest one of the most effective ways to limit climate change would be to reduce populations of ruminant livestock.
“We clearly need to reduce the burning of fossil fuels to cut CO2 emissions. But that addresses only part of the problem. We also need to reduce non-CO2 greenhouse gases to lessen the likelihood of us crossing this climatic threshold,” William Ripple of the College of Forestry at Oregon State University, one of the study’s authors, explains.
The study concludes that introducing a tax, or some kind of emission-trading scheme, on livestock’s emissions could be the most effective way to do this.
“Influencing human behaviour is one of the most challenging aspects of any large-scale policy, and it is unlikely that a large-scale dietary change will happen voluntarily without incentives,” it says.
Many scientists and leading climate change experts have previously suggested that encouraging the uptake of a vegetarian diet could provide a boost to the battle against climate change.
A study by Small World Consulting, published in 2012, found that if everyone in the UK became vegetarian, it would have the same effect on the environment as taking half of the country’s cars off the road.
In October, former World Bank chief economist Lord Stern suggested that eating meat could even become as socially unacceptable as drink driving.
“People change their notion of what is responsible. They will increasingly ask about the carbon content of their food,” he said.
Like our Facebook Page
How to Find an Eco-Friendly Termite Control Service Provider in Malaysia
Eco-Friendly Vegans Win Most Battles Not the War
3 Iconic Chicago Billboards Eco-Friendly Advertisers Can Learn from
EnviroSolar’s Abe Issa Discusses Success in Green Entrepreneurship
How Sports Could Be Impacted by Climate Change
What Eco-Friendly Patients Should Know about Online Therapy
6 Reasons Why Meal Delivery Services are Eco-Friendly
The Path for Retail’s Sustainable Future
4 Eco-Friendly Ways to Treat a Sinus Infection
4 Strategies for Eco-Friendly Real Estate Investors to Find Properties
How Managed Print Services Helps to Reduce Paper Waste
Why Scientists Are Concerned About ‘Forever Chemicals’ In Drinking Water
Meat Farming Is Only Getting Smarter, Easier & Eco-Friendlier
What is Eco-Friendly Homesteading and How Does it Affect Your Insurance?
Importance of Using a Water Purifier in an Area with High Pollution
Alternative Financing Ideas for Green Businesses that Shun Banks
Tencel Material Demand Shows Britain Is More Eco-Friendlier Than Ireland
How To Invest in Clean Energy Stocks in Only Five Easy Steps!
How To Secure Funding As An Eco-Entrepreneur?
4 Amazing Eco-Friendly Businesses Worth Starting in 2021
- Features8 months ago
Seven Health and Safety Tips for Eco-Friendly Products in a Green Home
- Energy9 months ago
Eco-Friendly Homeowners Lower Carbon Footprints through Greater Air Conditioner Efficiency
- Features8 months ago
Essential Guidelines for Eco-friendly Moving into new Home
- Invest10 months ago
The Eco-Friendly Evolution of Bitcoin Over the Years