The winners of this year’s Big Venture Challenge have been revealed today. Big Venture Challenge (BVC) recognises those who are tackling the problems we face as a nation through social projects and schemes. Each winner will receive a year of business support, connections to help them grow, and access to a £20,000 non-repayable grant to help them raise investment.
Winners include the chefs behind Papi’s Pickles, a catering service helping Sri Lankan women into employment, Cycle Systems, a cycle shop offering training for ex-military service men and women and Canvas Coffee Shop, who employ people in recovery from addiction.
Mark Norbury, Chief Executive of UnLtd of the Foundation of Social Entrepreneurs, said: “I’m delighted to introduce this year’s Big Venture Challenge winners – a set of incredibly passionate and talented people who are enabling some of the most vulnerable people in our society to find work. These social entrepreneurs are doing more than providing jobs – they are developing these individuals’ life chances. We believe that given the right support and access to funding, they have the potential to dramatically improve the employment landscape.”
The programme is run by UnLtd and funded by the Big Lottery Fund England. This year’s cohort has a special focus on social ventures providing access to education, training and skills, and contains many social entrepreneurs broadening access to the job market – categorised by UnLtd as Impact Employers.
The 20 winners of this year’s challenge will be publicly announced today, at a drinks reception at Hogan Lovells law firm in London. Other winners include Nottinghamshire based Textocracy, enabling public services to more effectively canvas citizen’s opinions and Year Here, which offers postgraduate courses in social innovation, working to build smart responses to poverty and inequality.
Since 2013, the Big Venture Challenge has supported entrepreneurs to raise over £8.2m of investment and scale their social impact, with ventures on average reaching 42% more beneficiaries each year. The programme has attracted over 40 new angel investors to social investing and many of the graduates of the previous years are now going on to raise Series A investments of over £1m.
Previous winners of Big Venture Challenge who raised investment through the programme include London’s first full time outdoor nursery that offers place to vulnerable children, Little Forest Folk, Goodwill Solutions, a logistics company employing people from disadvantaged backgrounds and Oomph! a provider of fun, inclusive and effective exercise classes for older adults.
About the BVC 2016 Winners
The full list of BVC 2016 Winners are as follows:
- Abi Ramanan, Papi’s Pickles, London; Restaurateurs working with unemployed women to provide South Indian and Sri Lankan food.
- Beverley Dean, Special iApps, Durham: building educational apps for children with Special Education Needs.
- Cemal Ezel, Change Please, London: employing people with a history of homelessness to work on mobile coffee vans.
- Cherie White, Think For the Future Ltd, Nottingham: offering Personal, Social, Health and Citizenship (PSHCE) education and mentoring to young people.
- Damian Payton, Hive Manchester, Manchester: creating young digital talent and linking to employers.
- Elizabeth Shassere, Textocracy Ltd, Worksop: enabling public services to more effectively canvas citizens.
- Jack Graham, Year Here, London: offering postgraduate courses in social innovation, working to build smart responses to poverty and inequality.
- Jemma Phibbs, 2JEvents, Oxfordshire: a venue management service letting service for schools, enabling them to rent out unused spaces and bring in income.
- Julia Lally, Cycle Systems, Devon: providing high quality training for ex-military service men and women in bicycle maintenance.
- Louise Allen, Essential Safeguarding: training for children and teachers on abuse in intimate teenage relationships.
- Pravin Isram, Canvas Coffee Shop, Hampshire: a speciality coffee shop supporting those in early recovery from addiction to develop skills and confidence.
- Ruth Anslow, hiSbe Food CIC, Brighton: an independent supermarket focusing on stimulating the local economy:
- Sandra Green, Green Revolutions CIC: enabling people to have access to transport.
- Sarah Wallbank, Yes Futures London: running extra-curricular personal development programmes to improving young people’s confidence, resilience and access to successful futures.
- Sarah Marie Taylor, Green Scene Education, Nottingham: offering horticultural classes which align to the primary school national curriculum, delivered on school grounds.
- Shaun Fox, Legacy Sport, Huddersfield: offering sport and health programmes to schools.
- Stacey Jade Mason, Creative Optimistic Visions, Coventry: supporting young people to be safer and better equipped around safeguarding.
- Steve Hodgkins, Jobs Friends & Houses CIC, Blackpool: job creation and training to prevent re-offending based around building trades and letting.
- Tara Ashkham, Infused Learning, Nottingham: providing post 19 qualifications through blended learning.
- Will Jackson, Zephx Ltd, Cambridge: app helping people suffering from chronic lung diseases to do their physiotherapy.
Is Wood Burning Sustainable For Your Home?
Wood is a classic heat source, whether we think about people gathered around a campfire or wood stoves in old cabins, but is it a sustainable source of heat in modern society? The answer is an ambivalent one. In certain settings, wood heat is an ideal solution, but for the majority of homes, it isn’t especially suitable. So what’s the tipping point?
Wood heat is ideal for small homes on large properties, for individuals who can gather their own wood, and who have modern wood burning ovens. A green approach to wood heat is one of biofuel on the smallest of scales.
Is Biofuel Green?
One of the reasons that wood heat is a source of so much divide in the eco-friendly community is that it’s a renewable resource and renewable has become synonymous with green. What wood heat isn’t, though, is clean or healthy. It lets off a significant amount of carbon and particulates, and trees certainly don’t grow as quickly as it’s consumed for heat.
Of course, wood is a much less harmful source of heat than coal, but for scientists interested in developing green energy sources, it makes more sense to focus on solar and wind power. Why, then, would they invest in improved wood burning technology?
Solar and wind technology are good large-scale energy solutions, but when it comes to small-space heating, wood has its own advantages. First, wood heat is in keeping with the DIY spirit of homesteaders and tiny house enthusiasts. These individuals are more likely to be driven to gather their own wood and live in small spaces that can be effectively heated as such.
Wood heat is also very effective on an individual scale because it requires very little infrastructure. Modern wood stoves made of steel rather than cast iron are built to EPA specifications, and the only additional necessary tools include a quality axe, somewhere to store the wood, and an appropriate covering to keep it dry. And all the wood can come from your own land.
Wood heat is also ideal for people living off the grid or in cold areas prone to frequent power outages, as it’s constantly reliable. Even if the power goes out, you know that you’ll be able to turn up the heat. That’s important if you live somewhere like Maine where the winters can get exceedingly cold. People have even successfully heated a 40’x34’ home with a single stove.
Benefits Of Biomass
The ultimate question regarding wood heat is whether any energy source that’s dangerous on the large scale is acceptable on a smaller one. For now, the best answer is that with a growing population and limited progress towards “pure” green energy, wood should remain a viable option, specifically because it’s used on a limited scale. Biomass heat is even included in the UK’s Renewable Heat Initiative and minor modifications can make it even more sustainable.
Wood stoves, when embraced in conjunction with pellet stoves, geothermal heating, and masonry heaters, all more efficient forms of sustainable heat, should be part of a modern energy strategy. Ultimately, we’re headed in the direction of diversified energy – all of it cleaner – and wood has a place in the big picture, serving small homes and off-the-grid structures, while solar, wind, and other large-scale initiatives fuel our cities.
New Climate Change Report Emphasizes Urgent Need for Airline Emission Regulations
In less than two months, the United States has grappled with some of the worst natural disasters in its history. Hurricanes battered the south central United States. Fires destroyed homes throughout Northern California. Puerto Rico experienced some of the worst storms ever. A massive windstorm caused more damage to the northeastern United States then any other storm on record before winter even struck.
These recent incidents have spurred discussion on the dangers of climate change. A recent report from the University of London has shed some light on the discussion. The new report suggests that new regulations are needed, including stricter EPA regulations on Airlines.
Review of the new report
The new report was published in the British medical Journal, Lancet. The report concluded that climate change is a “threat multiplier” for a variety of social problems, including diseases and natural disasters. While numerous studies have processed the risk that climate change plays with creating natural disasters, University of London report is among the first to explore the relationship between climate change and disease.
The authors warned that the problems are becoming irreversible. They will continue to get worse if risk factors are not adequately addressed.
The most concerning part of the report is that these problems are having the most serious impact on the most vulnerable communities in the world. Countries that depend on agriculture and other issues will suffer the most if climate change escalates.
“The answer is, most of our indicators are headed in the wrong direction,”said Nick Watts, a fellow at University College London’s Institute for Global Health and executive director of the Lancet Countdown, one of the lead researchers of the paper. “Broadly, the world has not responded to climate change, and that lack of response has put lives at risk. … The impacts we’re experiencing today are already pretty bad. The things we’re talking about in the future are potentially catastrophic.”
Airline industry discovers climate change is a two-way Street
The airline industry is coping with the problems of climate change, while also coming to terms with the fact that it has helped accelerate the problem. Earlier this year, American Airlines was forced to cancel four dozen flights near Phoenix. Cancellations were called due to excessive temperatures. The air was over 120 degrees, which is too hot for some smaller jet planes to get off the ground.
One anonymous airline executive privately admitted that their business model has facilitated climate change. They warned that the problem may become twice as bad in the next few years if proper safeguards aren’t implemented. Representatives from Goindigo have echoed these concerns.
The EPA has stated that airplanes account for 11% of all emissions. They are expected to increase over 50% within the next 30 years. This could have serious repurcussions if newer, greener airplane models don’t become the new standard in the very near future.
This is driving discussion about the need for new policies.The EPA has been discussing the need for new airline regulations for nearly two years. An EPA ruling made in July 2016 set the tone for new regulations, which could be introduced in the next year.
The new policies may be delayed, due to the new president’s position on climate change. He hired an EPA chief that has sued the organization about a dozen times. However, the Trump Administration may not be able to oppose climate change indefinitely, because a growing number of people are pressing for reforms. Even younger conservatives primarily believe climate change is a threat and are demanding answers. This may force the EPA to follow through on its plans to introduce new solutions.