BT, Vodafone and biopharmaceutical firm Astrazeneca have made it into the top three of a new ranking that grades firms based on their greenhouse gas emissions, relative to their turnover.
But the research, by thinktank the Environmental Investment Organisation (EIO), suggests that almost half of the UK’s biggest companies are failing to correctly report their carbon emissions.
The EIO’s Carbon Ranking report says that only 29% of the 100 largest firms in the UK publicly disclose and independently verify their Scope 1 and 2 emissions – Scope 1 being everything emitted within a company’s organisational boundary, and Scope 2 referring to electricity usage.
Fewer than half (48%) display complete data for Scopes 1 and 2, and only 9% fail to publicly disclose their emissions.
Meanwhile, 50% report Scope 3 emissions in some form. Scope 3 accounts for everything else – things that a company has influence over, but doesn’t control, such as its investments and its supply chain.
EIO chief executive Sam Gill, who spoke to Blue & Green Tomorrow on Tuesday about the work being done by his organisation, said, “As the world shifts towards a low-carbon model it’s extremely important that we have access to a reliable, consistent and cross-comparable greenhouse gas emissions database on the world’s largest companies.”
“This ought to be a wakeup call for companies. Since the majority of total corporate emissions often come from Scope 3 sources, large quantities of emissions are not being accounted for.
“Not only could this be a source of unmeasured risk for companies but it also means we are not getting the full picture in terms of corporate emissions. This is precisely why the Carbon Rankings are designed to encourage Scope 3 disclosure.”
Oil and gas firm Wood Group was ranked bottom of the UK 100, just below the likes of Sainsbury’s, William Hill and Compass Group. The EIO says this is because of incomplete or lack of public data.
The EIO has also produced Carbon Rankings for North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), as well as a global list set to be published on Friday.
In the European version, BASF (Germany), Swisscom (Switzerland) and Belgacom (Belgium) made up the top three.
The overall aim is to create a series of investable indices that mirror the FTSE 100 but that reweight firms based on their performance in the Carbon Rankings.
Like our Facebook Page
Emerging Research In Seagrass Restoration: What Does The Future Hold?
Sustainable Bites: How To Make Your Diet Eco-Friendly
Coffee Farms & Cloud Forests: Colombia’s New Eco Initiatives
Electric Cars: Are They Worth The Switch?
Maximizing the Efficiency of Deliveries: Strategies for Sustainable Businesses
The Rise of Sustainable Cloud Computing
Navigating Towards A Greener Future: Sustainable Practices In Maritime
5 Reasons That Diamonds Can Be Excellent Green Investments
Why Should We Invest in Eco-Friendly Homes?
Eco- Friendly Homes Integrating Environmental Consciousness into Modern Real Estate
The Future of Sustainability In The Logistics Industry
Can Eco-Friendly Businesses Embrace VPNs to Bolster Cybersecurity?
Doubt No More: Electric Vehicle Charging Dynamic Load Balancing Is The Answer
Fun Activities That Will Help Kids Appreciate Nature More
Eight Different Eco-Friendly Developments in the Food Industry
UK Lags EU in Installing Heat Pumps to Slow Climate Change
5 Key Areas to Look at When It Comes to Business Sustainability
Addressing Leadership Challenges in Green Entrepreneurship
Holding Eco-Friendly Coins is Greener and More Profitable
Eco-Friendly Airlines Use Weather Models to Make Safer Flights
- Features2 months ago
What is the Eco-Friendliest Option to Wash Your Dishes?
- Environment7 months ago
6 Home Improvements You Can Make to Help the Environment
- Environment11 months ago
How to Ensure Your Home’s Eco-Friendly During Construction?
- Business10 months ago
The Pulp & Paper Industry is Reaching its Sustainability Goals