Using GDP as the sole metric for prosperity is “woefully inadequate”, according to the Worldwatch Institute. Its latest report argues that most approaches to global economic health also ignore the planet’s capacity to provide the resources necessary to sustain it.
Figures show that in 2012 gross world product, the sum of GDP across all countries, increased to just over $83 trillion (£50.5 trillion) – a 4.85% increase when compared to 2011. The rise suggests that the effects of the 2008 financial crisis have somewhat passed. However, other indicators, such as unemployment levels, suggest this is not the case.
The Worldwatch Institute said, “Conventional economics regards economic growth as an unalloyed good, necessary to improve human well-being. But it is only a nominal indicator, lacking the many intricacies and more subjective goods that are essential to a more encompassing, holistic, and meaningful metric.
“Given the disparity benefits, it is clear that in and of itself, growth is far from an effective measuring stick.”
Newer metrics could paint a more comprehensive and accurate picture of global welfare, the organisation said. Alternatives include the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), which counts the economic cost of expenditures that diminish “community capital”.
The United Nations also prepares a Human Development Index, which measures health, education and living standards, which could provide a more inclusive picture of how countries are developing.
The Worldwatch Institute added that humanity has reached the point where it now consumes a year’s worth of resources in less than 365 days. As a result economic indicators should take into account the planet’s finite resources.
Victor Anderson, author of Alternative Economic Indicators, recently said it was “depressing” that his book, which outlined the need for alternative measures of economic success, had recently been reissued over two decades after first being published. He added it demonstrated how little progress has been made since 1991.
Economies also need to take into account the impact of climate change. More than 60 countries, including India and China, with a total output of $44 trillion (£26.7 trillion), are at high risk of extreme climate events by 2025, another recent study found.
Like our Facebook Page
Harnessing the Sun: The Far-reaching Benefits of Solar Panels
7 Benefits of Purchasing Sustainable Housing
Our Top Five Sustainable Home Renovations For 2023
6 Ways Eco-Friendly Photographers Can Take Beautiful Natural Pictures
Emerging Research In Seagrass Restoration: What Does The Future Hold?
Sustainable Bites: How To Make Your Diet Eco-Friendly
Coffee Farms & Cloud Forests: Colombia’s New Eco Initiatives
Electric Cars: Are They Worth The Switch?
Maximizing the Efficiency of Deliveries: Strategies for Sustainable Businesses
The Rise of Sustainable Cloud Computing
The Future of Sustainability In The Logistics Industry
Can Eco-Friendly Businesses Embrace VPNs to Bolster Cybersecurity?
Eight Different Eco-Friendly Developments in the Food Industry
UK Lags EU in Installing Heat Pumps to Slow Climate Change
5 Key Areas to Look at When It Comes to Business Sustainability
Addressing Leadership Challenges in Green Entrepreneurship
Holding Eco-Friendly Coins is Greener and More Profitable
5 Reasons That Diamonds Can Be Excellent Green Investments
Eco-Friendly Airlines Use Weather Models to Make Safer Flights
Why Should We Invest in Eco-Friendly Homes?
- Features3 months ago
What is the Eco-Friendliest Option to Wash Your Dishes?
- Environment7 months ago
6 Home Improvements You Can Make to Help the Environment
- Environment11 months ago
How to Ensure Your Home’s Eco-Friendly During Construction?
- Business10 months ago
The Pulp & Paper Industry is Reaching its Sustainability Goals