A new study has found that the majority of news articles about climate change are centred on narratives about disaster and uncertainty.
According to the research, from the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, this has led to the general public finding climate science difficult to understand.
The researchers found a “disaster narrative” in 82% of the articles analysed, and a similar proportion about uncertainty. However, only 26% of articles explained the “explicit risks” of different policy options.
The articles in the sample analysed covered the first two reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of 2007; the IPCC report on weather extremes in 2012; and the recent melt of Arctic sea ice.
Articles coded as having a “disaster or implicit risk” narrative were about sea level rises, more floods, water or food shortages, or population displacement. In the case of Arctic sea ice melt, this also included negative effects on the ocean ecosystem and nations living on the Arctic rim, or the heightened possibility of cold weather in the Northern Hemisphere.
James Painter, lead author of the report, said, “There is plenty of evidence showing that in many countries, the general public finds scientific uncertainty difficult to understand and confuse it with ignorance. We also know that disaster messages can be a turnoff, so for some people risk may be a more helpful language to use in this debate.
“Journalists are generally attracted to gloom and doom stories, but they are going to become more exposed to the language and concept of risks in covering climate science in the coming years.”
The research found that journalists often followed the prompts given by scientists and their reports. Around 70% of the articles covering reports by the IPCC, and nearly 60% of all articles in the sample, included quotes from scientist or scientific reports that researchers coded as “disaster narratives”. Nearly half the articles included a quote indicating some aspect of uncertainty.
The study concluded that advances in climate modelling and attribution are likely to lead to ‘more helpful’ language of explicit risk being increasingly used by journalists in the future.
Some 350 articles about climate change that were published between 2007 and 2012 were analysed. The sample covered three newspaper titles in six countries (UK, France, Australia, India, Norway and the USA).
Like our Facebook Page
Prominent Trends in Seafood Sustainability in 2022
Can PEMF Help To Improve Plant Growth for Eco-Friendly Gardeners
How the U.S. Government is Promoting Green Energy in the Country
12 Essential Things for Buying Your First Home
Harnessing Sustainability with User-Centric Technology Innovation
Making Your Dream of Having an Eco-Friendly Garden Come True
Tips for Optimal Waste Management in Your Home
The Agricultural Benefits of Weather Stations for Eco-Friendly Farmers
What Makes Online Furniture Eco-Friendly?
How Eco-Friendly Indian Tourists Can Apply for Visas to Brazil
7 Eco-Friendly Plant-Based Alternatives for Everyday Products
Teaching Them While They’re Young: Sustainability Tips for All Ages
Top 5 Benefits of Eco-Friendly Cars
Why Eco-Friendly Homes Should Have Outdoor Bathrooms
Merits of Sustainability Reporting: What Every Manager Must Know
Low Emission and Clean Air Zones: What You Need To Know
4 Ways To Build A Sustainable Home
Why Transitioning Your Company to an EV Fleet Makes Sense?
CEO Brian Ladin Explains How The Shipping Industry Is Going Green
A Guide to Eco-Friendly Landscaping
- Features11 months ago
Seven Health and Safety Tips for Eco-Friendly Products in a Green Home
- Energy11 months ago
Eco-Friendly Homeowners Lower Carbon Footprints through Greater Air Conditioner Efficiency
- Features10 months ago
Essential Guidelines for Eco-friendly Moving into new Home
- Features10 months ago
5 Compelling Reasons to Hire an Eco-Friendly Contractor