
Features
The benefits of going green must be fairly shared
The idea of government intervention to influence the composition of a country’s output has long been derided by economists for breeding inefficiency, reducing competition, encouraging lobbying and saddling countries with factories producing unwanted products. Likewise, environmental regulation is often seen as a barrier to growth.
However, supporting low-carbon technology could see the UK achieve long-term growth whilst significantly reducing the negative externalities associated with carbon emissions.
Theoretical models have shown that if a product is made using two substitutable inputs, one of which is “dirtier” but also cheaper than the other, then the market will not only tend to generate too much pollution but also produce a self-reinforcing cycle of innovation in the dirty product as researchers build on previous breakthroughs (American Economic Review, 2011).
Read more on Blue & Green Investor

Features11 months agoTop Agricultural Stocks to Watch
Sustainability11 months agoSustainable Travel in Christchurch: A Greener Way to Explore
Features11 months agoStaying Healthy on the Road: Eco-Conscious Habits for Global Travelers
Economy10 months agoRepairing vs. Recycling: Why Fixing Delivers Bigger Gains



















