Connect with us


Global Cleantech Summit opens with launch of ‘Accelerator 100’ project to support China’s Five-Year Plan



The Global Cleantech Summit in Beijing, China, hosted by The Climate Group, opened today with the launch of the ‘Accelerator 100′ project. Over 300 financial institutions, policymakers and leading clean technology firms from China, Europe, North America and beyond have gathered for the two day Summit aimed at driving the transformation in China’s energy, industrial and economic development.

The ‘Accelerator 100’ project, led by The Climate Group and partners, will connect 100 of the world’s leading clean technology and energy companies with investors through the Summit. By bringing these key businesses, investors and policymakers together, the project aims to support the effective commercialization and upscale of clean technologies. China is one of the largest growth markets for cleantech in the world, and is already expected to reach US$2.2 trillion by 2020.

Mark Kenber, CEO of The Climate Group said: “Following on from the historic Paris Agreement that clearly set out our low carbon future, the Global Cleantech Summit has a vision of continuing this innovation and creating partnerships needed to allow the global cleantech market to continue to flourish.

“From financing to facilitating policy frameworks, innovators to technology experts; cleantech companies around the world have the capabilities and expertise to truly drive our collective transition to a global low carbon economy. The ‘Accelerator 100’ project aims to do exactly that by convening these key stakeholders together and catalyse the investment and deployment of clean technologies to help support China – and the world’s – energy, industrial and economic landscape.”

The Summit also follows the recent release of China’s 13th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development, which placed ‘innovation’ at the forefront of priorities. The country’s plan targets 15% reduction in energy per unit of GDP by 2020 based on 2015 levels, and aims to cut carbon intensity by 18% in the same timeframe. In doing so, clean technologies are a focal point of the policy framework for delivering reduced national reliance on fossil fuels and to better institute energy efficiency in traditional industries.

Speaking on the opening day of the Summit, Wang Yi, Member of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress and Vice President of the Institute of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences,explained: “Green development is an important part of the construction of an ecological civilization, suggesting we should make the entire social economic system ‘green’ to establish a green production and consumption system in which systematic innovation, including technical, institutional, conceptual and innovative business models are pushed forward. This green development and environmental protection in China, the world’s second largest economy, has been included in its strategy of achieving global sustainable development goals.”

Business has also played a key role in shaping the Summit. Zhongwei Ma, Chairman of MagnaDrive Corporation Limited, Convening Partner of the Summit, said: “From a business perspective, green development simply means to reduce extensive development that results in high investment, pollution, energy consumption and emissions – and to speed up the change to green, low carbon and highly efficient development. We have every reason to believe that a booming market for cleantech and energy-conserving technologies is coming.”

During the Summit’s high-level plenary sessions, including The 13th FYP – Game changing technologies for a low carbon transition in China, the role of finance and investment was unanimously agreed to be a pivotal factor to further unleash these cleantech market opportunities. Speaking at the event, Li Weiqun, Secretary-General from the China Association of Private Equity, agreed: “The importance attached to the development of clean energies in the 13th Five-Year Plan implies that the cleantech investment market will heat up to be an investment hotspot and green industries will hopefully evolve into a new engine for China’s economic growth. The Chinese Government has been engaged in a number of endeavors in channeling the development of green finance while more efforts are needed to reinforce innovation, build up a green financial system and mobilize more social capital to participate in developing green finance.”

The Global Cleantech Summit takes place from 23-24 March. For more details, visit the website and follow #Cleantech2016.


Will Self-Driving Cars Be Better for the Environment?



self-driving cars for green environment
Shutterstock Licensed Photo - By Zapp2Photo |

Technologists, engineers, lawmakers, and the general public have been excitedly debating about the merits of self-driving cars for the past several years, as companies like Waymo and Uber race to get the first fully autonomous vehicles on the market. Largely, the concerns have been about safety and ethics; is a self-driving car really capable of eliminating the human errors responsible for the majority of vehicular accidents? And if so, who’s responsible for programming life-or-death decisions, and who’s held liable in the event of an accident?

But while these questions continue being debated, protecting people on an individual level, it’s worth posing a different question: how will self-driving cars impact the environment?

The Big Picture

The Department of Energy attempted to answer this question in clear terms, using scientific research and existing data sets to project the short-term and long-term environmental impact that self-driving vehicles could have. Its findings? The emergence of self-driving vehicles could essentially go either way; it could reduce energy consumption in transportation by as much as 90 percent, or increase it by more than 200 percent.

That’s a margin of error so wide it might as well be a total guess, but there are too many unknown variables to form a solid conclusion. There are many ways autonomous vehicles could influence our energy consumption and environmental impact, and they could go well or poorly, depending on how they’re adopted.

Driver Reduction?

One of the big selling points of autonomous vehicles is their capacity to reduce the total number of vehicles—and human drivers—on the road. If you’re able to carpool to work in a self-driving vehicle, or rely on autonomous public transportation, you’ll spend far less time, money, and energy on your own car. The convenience and efficiency of autonomous vehicles would therefore reduce the total miles driven, and significantly reduce carbon emissions.

There’s a flip side to this argument, however. If autonomous vehicles are far more convenient and less expensive than previous means of travel, it could be an incentive for people to travel more frequently, or drive to more destinations they’d otherwise avoid. In this case, the total miles driven could actually increase with the rise of self-driving cars.

As an added consideration, the increase or decrease in drivers on the road could result in more or fewer vehicle collisions, respectively—especially in the early days of autonomous vehicle adoption, when so many human drivers are still on the road. Car accident injury cases, therefore, would become far more complicated, and the roads could be temporarily less safe.


Deadheading is a term used in trucking and ridesharing to refer to miles driven with an empty load. Assume for a moment that there’s a fleet of self-driving vehicles available to pick people up and carry them to their destinations. It’s a convenient service, but by necessity, these vehicles will spend at least some of their time driving without passengers, whether it’s spent waiting to pick someone up or en route to their location. The increase in miles from deadheading could nullify the potential benefits of people driving fewer total miles, or add to the damage done by their increased mileage.

Make and Model of Car

Much will also depend on the types of cars equipped to be self-driving. For example, Waymo recently launched a wave of self-driving hybrid minivans, capable of getting far better mileage than a gas-only vehicle. If the majority of self-driving cars are electric or hybrids, the environmental impact will be much lower than if they’re converted from existing vehicles. Good emissions ratings are also important here.

On the other hand, the increased demand for autonomous vehicles could put more pressure on factory production, and make older cars obsolete. In that case, the gas mileage savings could be counteracted by the increased environmental impact of factory production.

The Bottom Line

Right now, there are too many unanswered questions to make a confident determination whether self-driving vehicles will help or harm the environment. Will we start driving more, or less? How will they handle dead time? What kind of models are going to be on the road?

Engineers and the general public are in complete control of how this develops in the near future. Hopefully, we’ll be able to see all the safety benefits of having autonomous vehicles on the road, but without any of the extra environmental impact to deal with.

Continue Reading


New Zealand to Switch to Fully Renewable Energy by 2035



renewable energy policy
Shutterstock Licensed Photo - By Eviart /

New Zealand’s prime minister-elect Jacinda Ardern is already taking steps towards reducing the country’s carbon footprint. She signed a coalition deal with NZ First in October, aiming to generate 100% of the country’s energy from renewable sources by 2035.

New Zealand is already one of the greenest countries in the world, sourcing over 80% of its energy for its 4.7 million people from renewable resources like hydroelectric, geothermal and wind. The majority of its electricity comes from hydro-power, which generated 60% of the country’s energy in 2016. Last winter, renewable generation peaked at 93%.

Now, Ardern is taking on the challenge of eliminating New Zealand’s remaining use of fossil fuels. One of the biggest obstacles will be filling in the gap left by hydropower sources during dry conditions. When lake levels drop, the country relies on gas and coal to provide energy. Eliminating fossil fuels will require finding an alternative source to avoid spikes in energy costs during droughts.

Business NZ’s executive director John Carnegie told Bloomberg he believes Ardern needs to balance her goals with affordability, stating, “It’s completely appropriate to have a focus on reducing carbon emissions, but there needs to be an open and transparent public conversation about the policies and how they are delivered.”

The coalition deal outlined a few steps towards achieving this, including investing more in solar, which currently only provides 0.1% of the country’s energy. Ardern’s plans also include switching the electricity grid to renewable energy, investing more funds into rail transport, and switching all government vehicles to green fuel within a decade.

Zero net emissions by 2050

Beyond powering the country’s electricity grid with 100% green energy, Ardern also wants to reach zero net emissions by 2050. This ambitious goal is very much in line with her focus on climate change throughout the course of her campaign. Environmental issues were one of her top priorities from the start, which increased her appeal with young voters and helped her become one of the youngest world leaders at only 37.

Reaching zero net emissions would require overcoming challenging issues like eliminating fossil fuels in vehicles. Ardern hasn’t outlined a plan for reaching this goal, but has suggested creating an independent commission to aid in the transition to a lower carbon economy.

She also set a goal of doubling the number of trees the country plants per year to 100 million, a goal she says is “absolutely achievable” using land that is marginal for farming animals.

Greenpeace New Zealand climate and energy campaigner Amanda Larsson believes that phasing out fossil fuels should be a priority for the new prime minister. She says that in order to reach zero net emissions, Ardern “must prioritize closing down coal, putting a moratorium on new fossil fuel plants, building more wind infrastructure, and opening the playing field for household and community solar.”

A worldwide shift to renewable energy

Addressing climate change is becoming more of a priority around the world and many governments are assessing how they can reduce their reliance on fossil fuels and switch to environmentally-friendly energy sources. Sustainable energy is becoming an increasingly profitable industry, giving companies more of an incentive to invest.

Ardern isn’t alone in her climate concerns, as other prominent world leaders like Justin Trudeau and Emmanuel Macron have made renewable energy a focus of their campaigns. She isn’t the first to set ambitious goals, either. Sweden and Norway share New Zealand’s goal of net zero emissions by 2045 and 2030, respectively.

Scotland already sources more than half of its electricity from renewable sources and aims to fully transition by 2020, while France announced plans in September to stop fossil fuel production by 2040. This would make it the first country to do so, and the first to end the sale of gasoline and diesel vehicles.

Many parts of the world still rely heavily on coal, but if these countries are successful in phasing out fossil fuels and transitioning to renewable resources, it could serve as a turning point. As other world leaders see that switching to sustainable energy is possible – and profitable – it could be the start of a worldwide shift towards environmentally-friendly energy.


Continue Reading