The European Ombudsman has launched an inquiry in response to the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) UK’s outrage at the European Commission and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) in supporting cosmetics testing on animals.
PETA’s complaint accuses the European bodies of overstepping their bounds in a shameful attempt to redefine the ban prohibiting cosmetics testing on animals. The EU Cosmetics Regulation bans tests on animals for cosmetics as well as the sale of cosmetics and ingredients that have been tested on animals anywhere in the world. Yet a flawed interpretation of the law by these regulatory authorities means that animals continue to die in tests of cosmetics ingredients.
Using the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulation – the world’s largest chemical-testing programme – as an excuse, the European Commission and ECHA, the agency responsible for administering REACH, have decided they will allow tests on animals for chemicals used exclusively in cosmetics when manufacturing workers may be exposed. For chemicals used in both cosmetics and other types of products, tests on animals are also permitted in a number of scenarios, violating both the Cosmetics and REACH Regulations, which are clear that animals should not die for new cosmetics products.
The REACH regulation states that it applies without prejudice to the Cosmetics Regulation, meaning that REACH may not be used to circumvent the animal-testing ban. Additionally, the European Commission is not authorised to introduce exemptions to the ban.
“Consumers are being given a false impression about the cruelty-free status of products when in fact companies may be testing ingredients on animals”, says PETA science policy advisor Dr Julia Baines. “With potentially thousands of animals’ lives at stake, we trust that the Ombudsman will agree that the authorities have gone beyond their remit in interpreting and applying the law. The purpose of the Cosmetics Regulation – which aims to ensure the safety of cosmetics products and ingredients using only humane, non-animal methods – must be maintained.”
Copies of PETA’s complaint and relevant correspondence are available upon request. For more information, please visit PETA.org.uk.
Like our Facebook Page
Can You Use Your PC In an Eco-Friendly Manner?
How Pain Management Hurts the Environment, and What You Can Do to Help
4 Countries That Have Banned Single-Use Plastic
What Is Your Carbon Footprint and How Can You Reduce it?
How Business Leaders Can Positively Impact Water Scarcity
Plant-Based Protein Coffee is Eco-Friendly & Healthy
Eco-Friendly Restaurants That Are Bringing the Outside Inside
5 Environmental Benefits of Custom Manufacturing
How to Reduce the Carbon Footprint of Your Office
Benefits of Starting an Eco-Friendly eCommerce Business
Brian Sheth and Sheth Sangreal Foundation Donate $15 Million to Global Wildlife Conservation
Eco-Friendly Gardeners Can Make Compost from Organic Waste
8 Great Tips to Find an Eco-Conscious Moving Company
Can Employers Help the Planet with Work from Home Policies?
Creating a Green Basement Environment for a Healthier Home
Switching to an Electric Car to Help the Environment? Here’s How to Find the Cheapest Insurance
More People Are Practicing Eco-Conscious Lawn-Care
Choosing the Best Air Filter as Pollution Levels Worsen
9 Tips to Write Stellar Papers as an Environmental Science Major
Why You Need to Know These Hard Facts About Ethical Investing
- Energy3 months ago
How To Choose the Right Solar Inverter for Your Home?
- Energy3 months ago
How to Choose the Best Solar Panel for Your Home
- Environment10 months ago
Importance of Using a Water Purifier in an Area with High Pollution
- Environment3 months ago
Reduce Industry Footprints with Sustainable Material Swaps