A decade after taking the reins of what is now the United Nations-supported Principles for Responsible Investment, James Gifford announced in August his intention to step aside. To mark his final week in the job, he spoke to Alex Blackburne about the last 10 years.
The date April 27 2006 is an historic one for New York City. Nearly five years after the September 11 terrorist attacks had brought down the twin towers of the World Trade Centre, construction began on the Freedom Tower – a monument to those killed in the atrocity.
“We are going to soar to new heights and reclaim New York’s skyline”, then-governor George Pataki said at the time. Only last week, seven years after building work got underway, One World Trade Centre – as it is now known – was confirmed as the tallest building in the western hemisphere.
Just a short walk from the where bulldozers were heading on that day, Kofi Annan – then-secretary-general of the United Nations (UN) – was giving a speech. Joined by asset owners worth more than $2 trillion (£1.2 trillion), he was ringing the opening bell on the UN-supported Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) at the New York Stock Exchange on Wall Street.
The beginning of construction work on One World Trade Centre rightly grabbed the headlines in New York City on that day. It was a symbol of the US’s defiance in the face of terrorism. But in the context of the long-term sustainability of the investment world – which shapes everything we do – Annan’s words to mark the launch of the PRI were equally historic.
“While finance fuels the global economy, investment decision-making does not sufficiently reflect environmental, social and corporate governance considerations – or put another way, the tenets of sustainable development”, he told attendees.
Watching on from the wings on that day was James Gifford, an Australian who had spent three years developing the PRI from his role at the UN Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI) in Geneva.
After a year-long consultation, involving Annan, UNEP FI and the UN Global Compact, six voluntary principles were drawn up, covering a range of environmental, social and governance (ESG) topics such as transparency, decision-making and active ownership. Asset managers were invited to become signatories, in a move that would help bolster their responsible investment credentials and the market more generally.
“There is a lot more to do from our signatories and there is huge potential to deepen responsible investment, but I think what we have done is dramatically increased the size of the market, and the thinking around and importance of responsible investment”, says Gifford, reflecting over the past decade.
“If you could encapsulate it within one concept, it is that we have made responsible investment normal. It’s becoming a norm. When the PRI was launched, I’d say it was right out on the edge. Fund managers who aren’t signatories – and this is from their own words – have said to me that they feel conspicuous by their absence. I think that alone is a huge achievement for this initiative.”
In the beginning, Gifford was the PRI’s only member of staff. It now has over 50, with partnership networks in nearly a dozen countries.
Thirty-two institutional asset owners with $2 trillion (£1.2 trillion) under management backed the PRI from launch, with its total signatories (including investment managers and professional service partners) nearing 100 by the end of April 2006. Just five days after Annan rang the bell on Wall Street, the European launch of PRI in Paris saw its assets double to $4 trillion (£2.5 trillion).
As of April 2013 – seven years after its launch in New York – the initiative boasts a total of 1,188 signatories, worth an estimated $34 trillion (£21.2 trillion).
Gifford is modest about the PRI’s growth and influence within the institutional investment world, adding that a large part of its success is down to the backing it continues to receive from the UN. Kofi Annan’s successor as UN secretary-general, Ban Ki-moon, has also strongly supported the initiative since taking on the role in 2007.
“I think bringing the legitimacy and gravitas of the secretary-general and the United Nations into the investment space is a unique contribution”, he says from the PRI’s headquarters on Rivington Street in London.
“There would have been other industry efforts and associations that would have done a lot of what we’re doing, but I think the fact that we are able to bring the UN to the table enabled us to reach out to a lot of people who would have otherwise not been as receptive.
“Yes, absolutely others would have stepped up and done implementation, support, shareholder engagement, collaborations and a lot of the other things we do, but I think we’ve added a unique angle through bringing a UN investor partnership forward which has raised the profile to a level that I think would have been difficult for other industry efforts.”
In September this year, the PRI broke ground when it launched a framework that would compel its signatories to publish financial reports to the wider public. While a large percentage of them already did this – as well as publishing more in-depth detail about their investment strategies – many did not. In 2011, 44% of signatories reported publicly through the PRI, up from 40% in 2010 and 25% in 2009.
Gifford says the PRI’s aim is to have 100% of its signatories disclosing their reports to the public by mid-next year, in what should be considered a positive move towards greater transparency in responsible investment.
Despite leading the charge towards mandatory reporting and a potentially ground-breaking next few years for the PRI and the responsible investment world, Gifford revealed in August that he would be moving on to pastures new in November. He is reserved about his future, but vocal on where the PRI must go next.
“Depth of implementation is the big challenge. That’s the big one. I think a lot of people now have policies in place a lot of people are now buying in research and a lot of people are joining collaborative shareholder engagements. The next big push has got to be the depth of that”, he says.
“The analogy is the corporate sustainability movement and the transition over the last 15 years in corporate thinking about the importance of sustainability. I think it’s now board level. You have chief sustainability officers reporting directly to CEOs. They have the ear of boards. There is the whole embedding of sustainability into the company strategy, and I think we will see the same with investment.”
In terms of retail investment, Gifford adds his voice to those who say the market has moved on from its historical roots in negative screening. To create real change, he argues that investors should look for funds that own companies with what he calls “challenges” and that are using shareholder engagement to revolutionise from within.
“The PRI has been successful within the institutional investment world, in demonstrating that integrating ESG factors into investment processes and ownership activities is core, mainstream activity, and it’s quite different from the traditional ethical investment movement. I think we’ve been successful in that.”
Ten years after Gifford and the UN Environment Programme Finance Initiative formulated the idea of a set of principles, and seven years after that concept became a reality, the PRI is in a strong position to lead a new wave of more sustainable and responsible investment. While Gifford won’t be a part of its future, his influence over the past decade is almost unrivalled in the industry.
He leaves his successor a powerful and engaged financial community with which to leverage positive change in the long-term. As Larry Silverstein, the owner of the twin towers who handed over control of One World Trade Centre to the Port Authority, said on the same day as the PRI launched, “This is an opportunity for us to show our determination, our resiliency, our resolve.”
James Gifford is executive director of the PRI and has been guiding the initiative since its inception in November 2003. He worked with UNEP FI and the UN Global Compact leading the PRI drafting process, and after the launch and the establishment of the secretariat in 2006, became its first executive director. He has a PhD from the Faculty of Economics and Business at the University of Sydney on the effectiveness of shareholder engagement in improving corporate environmental, social and corporate governance performance and is an honorary research fellow in the School of Management at the University of St Andrews. He has a background in IT and environmental protection. James has degrees in commerce and law from the University of Queensland, and a master’s of environment management from the University of New South Wales. He was named in 2010 by the World Economic Forum as one of 200 Young Global Leaders, and is stepping down from his PRI role in November 2013.
Ways Green Preppers Are Trying to Protect their Privacy
Environmental activists are not given the admiration that they deserve. A recent poll by Gallup found that a whopping 32% of Americans still doubt the existence of global warming. The government’s attitude is even worse.
Many global warming activists and green preppers have raised the alarm bell on climate change over the past few years. Government officials have taken notice and begun tracking their activity online. Even former National Guard officers have admitted that green preppers and climate activists are being targeted for terrorist watchlists.
Of course, the extent of their surveillance depends on the context of activism. People that make benign claims about climate change are unlikely to end up on a watchlist, although it is possible if they make allusions to their disdain of the government. However, even the most pacifistic and well intentioned environmental activists may unwittingly trigger some algorithm and be on the wrong side of a criminal investigation.
How could something like this happen? Here are some possibilities:
- They could share a post on social media from a climate extremist group or another individual on the climate watchlist.
- They could overly politicize their social media content, such as being highly critical of the president.
- They could use figures of speech that may be misinterpreted as threats.
- They might praise the goals of a climate change extremist organization that as previously resorted to violence, even if they don’t condone the actual means.
Preppers and environmental activists must do everything in their power to protect their privacy. Failing to do so could cost them their reputation, future career opportunities or even their freedom. Here are some ways that they are contacting themselves.
Living Off the Grid and Only Venturing to Civilization for Online Use
The more digital footprints you leave behind, the greater attention you draw. People that hold controversial views on environmentalism or doomsday prepping must minimize their digital paper trail.
Living off the grid is probably the best way to protect your privacy. You can make occasional trips to town to use the Wi-Fi and stock up on supplies.
Know the Surveillance Policies of Public Wi-Fi Providers
Using Wi-Fi away from your home can be a good way to protect your privacy.However, choosing the right public Wi-Fi providers is going to be very important.
Keep in mind that some corporate coffee shops such a Starbucks can store tapes for up to 60 days. Mom and pop businesses don’t have the technology nor the interest to store them that long. They generally store tips for only 24 hours and delete them afterwards. This gives you a good window of opportunity to post your thoughts on climate change without being detected.
Always use a VPN with a No Logging Policy
Using a VPN is one of the best ways to protect your online privacy. However, some of these providers do a much better job than others. What is a VPN and what should you look for when choosing one? Here are some things to look for when making a selection:
- Make sure they are based in a country that has strict laws on protecting user privacy. VPNs that are based out of Switzerland, Panama for the British Virgin Islands are always good bets.
- Look for VPN that has a strict no logging policy. Some VPNs will actually track the websites that you visit, which almost entirely defeats the purpose. Most obviously much better than this, but many also track Your connections and logging data. You want to use a VPN that doesn’t keep any logs at all.
- Try to choose a VPN that has an Internet kill switch. This means that all content will stop serving if your VPN connection drops, which prevents your personal data from leaking out of the VPN tunnel.
You will be much safer if you use a high-quality VPN consistently, especially if you have controversial views on climate related issues or doomsday prepping.
How Going Green Can Save Your Business Thousands
Running a company isn’t easy. From reporting wages in an efficient way to meeting deadlines and targets, there’s always something to think about – with green business ideas giving entrepreneurs something extra to ponder. While environmental issues may not be at the forefront of your mind right now, it could save your business thousands, so let’s delve deeper into this issue.
Small waste adds up over time
A computer left on overnight might not seem like the end of the world, right? Sure, it’s a rather minor issue compared to losing a client or being refused a loan – but small waste adds up over time. Conserving energy is an effective money saver, so to hold onto that hard-earned cash, try to:
- Turn all electrical gadgets off at the socket rather than leaving them on standby as the latter can crank up your energy bill without you even realizing.
- Switch all lights off when you exit a room and try switching to halogen incandescent light bulbs, compact fluorescent lamps or light emitting diodes as these can use up to 80 per cent less energy than traditional incandescent and are therefore more efficient.
- Replace outdated appliances with their greener counterparts. Energy Star appliances have labels which help you to understand their energy requirements over time.
- Draught-proof your premises as sealing up leaks could slash your energy bills by 30 per cent.
Going electronic has significant benefits
If you don’t want to be buried under a mountain of paperwork, why not opt for digital documents instead of printing everything out? Not only will this save a lot of money on paper and ink but it will also conserve energy and help protect the planet. You may even be entitled to one of the many tax breaks and grants issued to organizations committed to achieving their environmental goals. This is particularly good news for start-ups with limited funds as the Environment Protection Agency (EPA) is keen to support companies opening up their company in a green manner.
Of course, if you’re used to handing out brochures and leaflets at every company meeting or printing out newsletters whenever you get the chance, going electronic may be a challenge – but here are some things you can try:
- Using PowerPoint presentations not printouts
- Communicating via instant messenger apps or email
- Using financial software to manage your books
- Downloading accounting software to keep track of figures
- Arranging digital feedback and review forms
- Making the most of Google Docs
Going green can help you to make money too
Going green and environmental stability is big news at the moment with many companies doing their bit for the environment. While implementing eco-friendly strategies will certainly save you money, reducing your carbon footprint could also make you a few bucks too. How? Well, consumers care about what brands are doing more than ever before, with many deliberately siding with those who are implementing green policies. Essentially, doing your bit for the environment is a PR dream as it allows you to talk about what everyone wants to hear.
Going green can certainly save your money but it should also improve your reputation too and give you a platform to promote your business.