A number of conservation groups have responded to the government’s environmental statement for the HS2 high-speed rail project, saying it would cause the destruction of 49 ancient woodlands, some of which could be avoided.
The hybrid bill, containing a detailed environmental assessment of the impact of HS2, was published in November last year. It received criticism because conservation groups said they had little time to scrutinise the long document. They claimed it was inaccurate and showed “shocking disregard for nature”.
After reviewing the document, a coalition of the Woodland Trust, the Ramblers Association, Berks, Bucks and Oxon Wildlife Trust, the Chilterns Conservation Board, Buckinghamshire county council and MP Cheryl Gillan has prepared a document to hand to David Cameron.
They say that during phase one of the construction, which will link London to Birmingham, Manchester, Leeds and the East Midlands, 49 ancient woodlands will be threatened with loss or damage.
Hilary Allison, policy director at the Woodland Trust, said that ancient woodlands were “a unique and irreplaceable habitat, widely recognised as having national importance”.
She said that some of the damage could be easily avoided, by reviewing plans to extend a tunnel.
She explained, “Just one example of this is the fact that HS2 Ltd see fit to place a tunnel portal in the middle of ancient Mantle’s Wood in Buckinghamshire. No amount of new planting would ever compensate for the loss of ancient woodland so this is indefensible, especially when you consider that extending the tunnel by less than 1km would save the whole wood.”
Meanwhile Steve Rodrick, CEO of the Chilterns Conservation Board, added, “As both ancient woodland and the Chilterns area of outstanding natural beauty have been given national protection, how can it make sense to destroy them? A full-length tunnel bored under the Chilterns to save these national treasures is both desirable and practical.”
However, conservationists said that the extent of damage to woods and wildlife was difficult to establish, as the government gave little information on mitigation measures.
Alison added, “Given the scale of environmental impact revealed by our detailed analysis, as well as the document’s omissions and inaccuracies, we hope to see government give the next stage of this crucial process the proper time and attention it now requires.”
Like our Facebook Page
How to Find an Eco-Friendly Termite Control Service Provider in Malaysia
Eco-Friendly Vegans Win Most Battles Not the War
3 Iconic Chicago Billboards Eco-Friendly Advertisers Can Learn from
EnviroSolar’s Abe Issa Discusses Success in Green Entrepreneurship
How Sports Could Be Impacted by Climate Change
What Eco-Friendly Patients Should Know about Online Therapy
6 Reasons Why Meal Delivery Services are Eco-Friendly
The Path for Retail’s Sustainable Future
4 Eco-Friendly Ways to Treat a Sinus Infection
4 Strategies for Eco-Friendly Real Estate Investors to Find Properties
How Managed Print Services Helps to Reduce Paper Waste
Why Scientists Are Concerned About ‘Forever Chemicals’ In Drinking Water
Meat Farming Is Only Getting Smarter, Easier & Eco-Friendlier
What is Eco-Friendly Homesteading and How Does it Affect Your Insurance?
Importance of Using a Water Purifier in an Area with High Pollution
Alternative Financing Ideas for Green Businesses that Shun Banks
Tencel Material Demand Shows Britain Is More Eco-Friendlier Than Ireland
How To Invest in Clean Energy Stocks in Only Five Easy Steps!
How To Secure Funding As An Eco-Entrepreneur?
4 Amazing Eco-Friendly Businesses Worth Starting in 2021
- Features8 months ago
Seven Health and Safety Tips for Eco-Friendly Products in a Green Home
- Energy9 months ago
Eco-Friendly Homeowners Lower Carbon Footprints through Greater Air Conditioner Efficiency
- Features8 months ago
Essential Guidelines for Eco-friendly Moving into new Home
- Invest10 months ago
The Eco-Friendly Evolution of Bitcoin Over the Years