Connect with us


Report: largest global banks failing to play long game on climate change



A new report examining 61 of the world’s largest banks on their management of climate-related risks concludes that despite welcomed statements and announcements by some banks ahead of COP21, few are taking a strategic approach to these potentially game changing developments. There remains a huge divide between banks’ current practices and the financial sector’s potential to support the transition to a low-carbon future.

The results showed:

Inadequate disclosure across the industry – Many of the banks surveyed do not adequately assess the carbon risk of their lending and underwriting, or conduct climate-related stress tests. No bank is currently measuring its carbon footprint.

Some of the biggest banks are not at the table – Of the world’s ten largest banks only two are ranked in the Top 10 for climate management (Bank of China, Citigroup).

A $4.8 trillion opportunity not yet grasped – Significant funding is required for the transition to a low-carbon economy, yet most banks assessed do not have quantitative targets for increased investment/financing of energy efficiency or renewable energy projects.

The research was conducted by Boston Common Asset Management and backed by a $500bn coalition of 80 global, institutional investors. The banks included the world’s largest underwriters of carbon-intensive industries such as oil & gas, pipelines and coal. Lead investor partners included Australian Ethical Investment (Australia), Bâtirente (Canada), Church of Sweden (Sweden), Cometa Pension Funds (Italy) and Ethos Foundation (Switzerland).

Lauren Compere, Managing Director at Boston Common, said: “With the Paris climate summit fast approaching, the analysis shows a worrying lack of a strategic, long-term approach to climate risk across many of our leading banks. We believe banks are not adequately measuring, managing and disclosing these risks. COP21 highlights the significant need for investments to transition the world to a low carbon economy. Banks have a critical role to play here. As the Governor of the Bank of England said earlier this month there is still time to act, but the window of opportunity is finite and shrinking.”

Independent SRI Consultant John Fleetwood of 3D Investing said: “It’s astonishing that no bank currently measures its carbon footprint.  Greater transparency on carbon exposure is welcome but there’s a long way to go and it strikes me as incongruous that many banks claim to be concerned about climate change but continue to lend to some of the most carbon intensive industries.”

According to the report the top 10 performing banks on climate management are:

Banks and Climate Change















Overall bank performance:

Banks and Climate Change Overall Performance

Boston Common assessed the banks on a relative ‘peer-to-peer’ basis across three criteria: ‘risk management’, ‘climate change strategy’ and ‘opportunities’. In total 45 out of 61 approached banks responded with information in writing or as part of a dialogue.

Stuart Palmer, Head of Ethics at investor partner Australian Ethical Investment, said: “Leading banks are increasing the transparency of their lending to both fossil fuel and low carbon companies, along with measures to limit one and expand the other. While it is great to see Australian banks leading the way, clearer commitments are needed to align their businesses with a path to a safe climate future.”

“Boston Common’s Financing Climate Change Bank Initiative is an important addition to local activity in Australia, signalling to the banks the strong international interest in their governance of climate risk and opportunity.”

From strategy to stress tests the investor coalition agreed on four actions from the world’s largest banks to improve their rankings:

1) Establish long-term, comprehensive climate strategies with board-level oversight and links to compensation;

2)Report on total carbon footprint of their financing activities, with development of reduction targets.

3) Report quantitative figures for supporting energy efficiency and renewable energy; and

4) Conduct regular environmental stress tests.

The investor coalition is planning to follow up with the same group of banks to measure progress in the next year.


How Going Green Can Save A Company Money



going green can save company money
Shutterstock Licensed Photot - By GOLFX

What is going green?

Going green means to live life in a way that is environmentally friendly for an entire population. It is the conservation of energy, water, and air. Going green means using products and resources that will not contaminate or pollute the air. It means being educated and well informed about the surroundings, and how to best protect them. It means recycling products that may not be biodegradable. Companies, as well as people, that adhere to going green can help to ensure a safer life for humanity.

The first step in going green

There are actually no step by step instructions for going green. The only requirement needed is making the decision to become environmentally conscious. It takes a caring attitude, and a willingness to make the change. It has been found that companies have improved their profit margins by going green. They have saved money on many of the frivolous things they they thought were a necessity. Besides saving money, companies are operating more efficiently than before going green. Companies have become aware of their ecological responsibility by pursuing the knowledge needed to make decisions that would change lifestyles and help sustain the earth’s natural resources for present and future generations.

Making needed changes within the company

After making the decision to go green, there are several things that can be changed in the workplace. A good place to start would be conserving energy used by electrical appliances. First, turning off the computer will save over the long run. Just letting it sleep still uses energy overnight. Turn off all other appliances like coffee maker, or anything that plugs in. Pull the socket from the outlet to stop unnecessary energy loss. Appliances continue to use electricity although they are switched off, and not unplugged. Get in the habit of turning off the lights whenever you leave a room. Change to fluorescent light bulbs, and lighting throughout the building. Have any leaks sealed on the premises to avoid the escape of heat or air.

Reducing the common paper waste

paper waste

Shutterstock Licensed Photo – By Yury Zap

Modern technologies and state of the art equipment, and tools have almost eliminated the use of paper in the office. Instead of sending out newsletters, brochures, written memos and reminders, you can now do all of these and more by technology while saving on the use of paper. Send out digital documents and emails to communicate with staff and other employees. By using this virtual bookkeeping technique, you will save a bundle on paper. When it is necessary to use paper for printing purposes or other services, choose the already recycled paper. It is smartly labeled and easy to find in any office supply store. It is called the Post Consumer Waste paper, or PCW paper. This will show that your company is dedicated to the preservation of natural resources. By using PCW paper, everyone helps to save the trees which provides and emits many important nutrients into the atmosphere.

Make money by spreading the word

Companies realize that consumers like to buy, or invest in whatever the latest trend may be. They also cater to companies that are doing great things for the quality of life of all people. People want to know that the companies that they cater to are doing their part for the environment and ecology. By going green, you can tell consumers of your experiences with helping them and communities be eco-friendly. This is a sound public relations technique to bring revenue to your brand. Boost the impact that your company makes on the environment. Go green, save and make money while essentially preserving what is normally taken for granted. The benefits of having a green company are enormous for consumers as well as the companies that engage in the process.

Continue Reading


Report: Green, Ethical and Socially Responsible Finance



“The level of influence that ethical considerations have over consumer selection of financial services products and services is minimal, however, this is beginning to change. Younger consumers are more willing to pay extra for products provided by socially responsible companies.” Jessica Morley, Mintel’s Financial Services Analyst.

Consumer awareness of the impact consumerism has on society and the planet is increasing. In addition, the link between doing good and feeling good has never been clearer. Just 19% of people claim to not participate in any socially responsible activities.

As a result, the level of attention that people pay to the green and ethical claims made by products and providers is also increasing, meaning that such considerations play a greater role in the purchasing decision making process.

However, this is less true in the context of financial services, where people are much more concerned about the performance of a product rather than green and ethical factors. This is not to say, however, that they are not interested in the behaviour of financial service providers or in gaining more information about how firms behave responsibly.

This report focuses on why these consumer attitudes towards financial services providers exist and how they are changing. This includes examination of the wider economy and the current structure of the financial services sector.

Mintel’s exclusive consumer research looks at consumer participation in socially responsible activities, trust in the behaviour of financial services companies and attitudes towards green, ethical and socially responsible financial services products and providers. The report also considers consumer attitudes towards the social responsibilities of financial services firms and the green, ethical and socially responsible nature of new entrants.

There are some elements missing from this report, such as conducting socially responsible finance with OTC trading. We will cover these other topics in more detail in the future. You can research about Ameritrade if you want to know more ..

By this report today: call: 0203 416 4502 | email: iainooson[at]

Report contents:

What you need to know
Report definition
The market
Ethical financial services providers: A question of culture
Investment power
Consumers need convincing
The transformative potential of innovation
Consumers can demand change
The consumer
For financial products, performance is more important than principle
Competition from technology companies
Financial services firms perceived to be some of the least socially responsible
Repaying the social debt
Consumer trust is built on evidence
What we think
Creating a more inclusive economy
The facts
The implications
Payments innovation helps fundraising go digital
The facts
The implications
The social debt of the financial crisis
The facts
The implications
Ethical financial services providers: A question of culture
Investment power
Consumers need convincing
The transformative potential of innovation
Consumers can demand change
An ethical economy
An ethical financial sector
Ethical financial services providers
The role of investing
The change potential of pensions
The role of trust
Greater transparency informs decisions
Learning from past mistakes
The role of innovation
Payments innovation: Improving financial inclusion
Competition from new entrants
The power of new money
The role of the consumer
Consumers empowered to make a change
Aligning products with self
For financial products, performance is more important than ethics
Financial services firms perceived to be some of the least socially responsible
Competition from technology companies
Repaying the social debt
Consumer trust is built on evidence
Overall trust levels are high
Payments innovation can boost charitable donations
Consumer engagement in socially responsible activities is high
Healthier finances make it easier to go green
37% unable to identify socially responsible companies
Building societies seen to be more responsible than banks….
….whilst short-term loan companies are at the bottom of the pile
Overall trust levels are high
Tax avoidance remains a major concern
The divestment movement
Nationwide significantly more trusted
Trust levels remain high
For financial products, performance is more important than principle
Socially conscious consumers are more concerned
Strategy reports provide little insight for consumers
Lack of clarity regarding corporate culture causes concern
Consumers want more information
The social debt of the financial crisis
For consumers, financial services firms play larger economic role
Promoting financial responsibility
Consumer trust is built on evidence
The alternative opportunity
The target customer

Continue Reading