Connect with us


Monsanto’s Lobbying Practices Scrutinised In New Report



Monsanto's Lobbying Practices Scrutinised In New Report

Corporate Europe Observatory have been presenting an overview Monsanto’s lobbying strategies at national, EU, and international levels in the build up to the opening of the International Monsanto Tribunal in The Hague.

In its new guide, ‘Monsanto lobbying: an attack on us, our planet and democracy’, Corporate Europe Observatory focuses on the firm’s many lobbying tricks and tools; the types of lobbyists (commanders, ground troups and accomplices), and the money spent to buy power. It shows how the revolving door spins ex-Monsanto staff into powerful positions in government, how scientists get paid to act as Monsanto’s mouthpiece, and how lobby associations unknown to the public coordinate lobbying strategies for the pesticide and biotech sectors, including its supposed ‘competitors’ Bayer, BASF, Syngenta, and Dow/Dupont. All of this helps the company to capture political decision-making.

CEO’s research shows that Monsanto and its lobby groups are under-reporting on their lobby expenditure in Brussels. Amounts disclosed in the EU’s Transparency register are only a fraction of the real amount spent on influencing EU decision-making.

The Brussels lobbying battle around the firm’s best-selling herbicide Roundup – suspected to cause cancer in humans – is illustrative of how Monsanto takes a grab in the lobby tool box when faced with a political hurdle, while staying almost entirely below the radar. The campaign is run by the Glyphosate Task Force from the offices of lobby firm Hume Brophy in the EU quarter. When challenged by an independent report by the WHO cancer institute IARC, stating glyphosate “probably causes cancer in humans”, Monsanto paid scientists to discredit IARC’s conclusions.


It is astonishing to see how far Monsanto lobbying has sunk its teeth into public decision-making across the world.


In the US, Monsanto (aided by the Big Food lobby) managed to derail the proper labelling of genetically modified foods. In several African countries it helps set up pro-GM lobby groups and is posing as a benign saviour bringing GM crops – often with funding from The Gates Foundation.

Through ‘free’ trade agreements like TTIP and CETA, Monsanto’s pesticide lobby associations ECPA and Croplife America aim to downgrade the EU’s pesticide rules and prevent strongly needed improvements to those rules and their implementation.

Corporate Europe Observatory’s agribusiness researcher Nina Holland comments:

“It is astonishing to see how far Monsanto lobbying has sunk its teeth into public decision-making across the world. Monsanto’s lobby tactics are hollowing out democracy right in front of our eyes. A perverse symbiosis exists between corporate lobby groups and decision makers, which consistently leads to decisions made in favour of industry, not the public interest.”

The International Monsanto Tribunal in The Hague – supported by CEO and hundreds of other organisations – will put Monsanto ‘on trial’ in front of a panel of five internationally renowned judges who will hear 30 witnesses and experts from 5 continents. The Monsanto Tribunal aims to include crimes against the environment (‘ecocide’) into international criminal law.



Is Wood Burning Sustainable For Your Home?



sustainable wood burning ideas

Wood is a classic heat source, whether we think about people gathered around a campfire or wood stoves in old cabins, but is it a sustainable source of heat in modern society? The answer is an ambivalent one. In certain settings, wood heat is an ideal solution, but for the majority of homes, it isn’t especially suitable. So what’s the tipping point?

Wood heat is ideal for small homes on large properties, for individuals who can gather their own wood, and who have modern wood burning ovens. A green approach to wood heat is one of biofuel on the smallest of scales.

Is Biofuel Green?

One of the reasons that wood heat is a source of so much divide in the eco-friendly community is that it’s a renewable resource and renewable has become synonymous with green. What wood heat isn’t, though, is clean or healthy. It lets off a significant amount of carbon and particulates, and trees certainly don’t grow as quickly as it’s consumed for heat.

Of course, wood is a much less harmful source of heat than coal, but for scientists interested in developing green energy sources, it makes more sense to focus on solar and wind power. Why, then, would they invest in improved wood burning technology?

Homegrown Technology

Solar and wind technology are good large-scale energy solutions, but when it comes to small-space heating, wood has its own advantages. First, wood heat is in keeping with the DIY spirit of homesteaders and tiny house enthusiasts. These individuals are more likely to be driven to gather their own wood and live in small spaces that can be effectively heated as such.

Wood heat is also very effective on an individual scale because it requires very little infrastructure. Modern wood stoves made of steel rather than cast iron are built to EPA specifications, and the only additional necessary tools include a quality axe, somewhere to store the wood, and an appropriate covering to keep it dry. And all the wood can come from your own land.

Wood heat is also ideal for people living off the grid or in cold areas prone to frequent power outages, as it’s constantly reliable. Even if the power goes out, you know that you’ll be able to turn up the heat. That’s important if you live somewhere like Maine where the winters can get exceedingly cold. People have even successfully heated a 40’x34’ home with a single stove.

Benefits Of Biomass

The ultimate question regarding wood heat is whether any energy source that’s dangerous on the large scale is acceptable on a smaller one. For now, the best answer is that with a growing population and limited progress towards “pure” green energy, wood should remain a viable option, specifically because it’s used on a limited scale. Biomass heat is even included in the UK’s Renewable Heat Initiative and minor modifications can make it even more sustainable.

Wood stoves, when embraced in conjunction with pellet stoves, geothermal heating, and masonry heaters, all more efficient forms of sustainable heat, should be part of a modern energy strategy. Ultimately, we’re headed in the direction of diversified energy – all of it cleaner – and wood has a place in the big picture, serving small homes and off-the-grid structures, while solar, wind, and other large-scale initiatives fuel our cities.

Continue Reading


New Climate Change Report Emphasizes Urgent Need for Airline Emission Regulations




In less than two months, the United States has grappled with some of the worst natural disasters in its history. Hurricanes battered the south central United States. Fires destroyed homes throughout Northern California. Puerto Rico experienced some of the worst storms ever. A massive windstorm caused more damage to the northeastern United States then any other storm on record before winter even struck.

These recent incidents have spurred discussion on the dangers of climate change. A recent report from the University of London has shed some light on the discussion. The new report suggests that new regulations are needed, including stricter EPA regulations on Airlines.

Review of the new report

The new report was published in the British medical Journal, Lancet. The report concluded that climate change is a “threat multiplier” for a variety of social problems, including diseases and natural disasters. While numerous studies have processed the risk that climate change plays with creating natural disasters, University of London report is among the first to explore the relationship between climate change and disease.

The authors warned that the problems are becoming irreversible. They will continue to get worse if risk factors are not adequately addressed.

The most concerning part of the report is that these problems are having the most serious impact on the most vulnerable communities in the world. Countries that depend on agriculture and other issues will suffer the most if climate change escalates.

“The answer is, most of our indicators are headed in the wrong direction,”said Nick Watts, a fellow at University College London’s Institute for Global Health and executive director of the Lancet Countdown, one of the lead researchers of the paper. “Broadly, the world has not responded to climate change, and that lack of response has put lives at risk. … The impacts we’re experiencing today are already pretty bad. The things we’re talking about in the future are potentially catastrophic.”

Airline industry discovers climate change is a two-way Street

The airline industry is coping with the problems of climate change, while also coming to terms with the fact that it has helped accelerate the problem. Earlier this year, American Airlines was forced to cancel four dozen flights near Phoenix. Cancellations were called due to excessive temperatures. The air was over 120 degrees, which is too hot for some smaller jet planes to get off the ground.

One anonymous airline executive privately admitted that their business model has facilitated climate change. They warned that the problem may become twice as bad in the next few years if proper safeguards aren’t implemented. Representatives from Goindigo have echoed these concerns.

The EPA has stated that airplanes account for 11% of all emissions. They are expected to increase over 50% within the next 30 years. This could have serious repurcussions if newer, greener airplane models don’t become the new standard in the very near future.

This is driving discussion about the need for new policies.The EPA has been discussing the need for new airline regulations for nearly two years. An EPA ruling made in July 2016 set the tone for new regulations, which could be introduced in the next year.

The new policies may be delayed, due to the new president’s position on climate change. He hired an EPA chief that has sued the organization about a dozen times. However, the Trump Administration may not be able to oppose climate change indefinitely, because a growing number of people are pressing for reforms. Even younger conservatives primarily believe climate change is a threat and are demanding answers. This may force the EPA to follow through on its plans to introduce new solutions.

Continue Reading