A coalition of business leaders and policy experts has launched a campaign demanding that the city of Liverpool be linked directly to the proposed HS2 high speed rail line.
The ‘20 Miles More’ campaign has sent an open letter to the government, arguing that extending the proposed route by just 20 miles to Liverpool would bring a number of business and economic benefits.
Under current plans, HS2 will run from London to Birmingham by 2026 and to Manchester and Leeds by 2033.
The campaigners say that a Liverpool HS2 branch would add £1.5 billion to the overall cost of the project, while providing a return of £2.70 for every £1 invested. They claim some £8 billion in economic benefits would be generated for Liverpool itself.
The letter also points to the £1.8 billion that is being spent on expanding the Port of Liverpool to accommodate the Post-Panamax carriers. It adds that this investment will only reap maximum returns if there is a sufficient increase in local freight capacity.
Removing passenger services off the West Coast Mainline onto HS2, it argues, could provide this capacity.
Andrew Morris, director of 20 Miles More, said extending the line “will ensure that the economic growth that is very much in evidence in the city will not be jeopardised”.
Phillip Blond, a signatory of the letter and director of the thinktank ResPublica, added, “It’s imperative that Liverpool shares in the hugely enhanced connectivity that will be provided by HS2.
“It will otherwise be massively disadvantaged when trying to compete with other cities by relying on 19th century infrastructure, slower journey times and, potentially, reduced passenger capacity.”
HS2 has proved highly controversial since its announcement. Though the Supreme Court rejected a legal challenge against the project last week, opponents still hold a number of concerns, including the disputed cost.
On Thursday, the transport secretary Patrick McLoughlin reportedly blocked the release of a 2011 review that those against the high speed network said undermined its development. Meanwhile, environmental campaigners have said that the official environmental impact assessment of the project demonstrates “a shocking disregard” for England’s woodland and wildlife.
Critics have also refuted claims that the development will help the UK lower its carbon emissions, pointing to a paper by HS2 Ltd that says carbon emissions caused by the line will outweigh carbon savings over the first 60 years of operation.
Like our Facebook Page
Prominent Trends in Seafood Sustainability in 2022
Can PEMF Help To Improve Plant Growth for Eco-Friendly Gardeners
How the U.S. Government is Promoting Green Energy in the Country
12 Essential Things for Buying Your First Home
Harnessing Sustainability with User-Centric Technology Innovation
Making Your Dream of Having an Eco-Friendly Garden Come True
Tips for Optimal Waste Management in Your Home
The Agricultural Benefits of Weather Stations for Eco-Friendly Farmers
What Makes Online Furniture Eco-Friendly?
How Eco-Friendly Indian Tourists Can Apply for Visas to Brazil
7 Eco-Friendly Plant-Based Alternatives for Everyday Products
Teaching Them While They’re Young: Sustainability Tips for All Ages
Top 5 Benefits of Eco-Friendly Cars
Why Eco-Friendly Homes Should Have Outdoor Bathrooms
Merits of Sustainability Reporting: What Every Manager Must Know
Low Emission and Clean Air Zones: What You Need To Know
4 Ways To Build A Sustainable Home
Why Transitioning Your Company to an EV Fleet Makes Sense?
CEO Brian Ladin Explains How The Shipping Industry Is Going Green
A Guide to Eco-Friendly Landscaping
- Features11 months ago
Seven Health and Safety Tips for Eco-Friendly Products in a Green Home
- Energy11 months ago
Eco-Friendly Homeowners Lower Carbon Footprints through Greater Air Conditioner Efficiency
- Features10 months ago
Essential Guidelines for Eco-friendly Moving into new Home
- Features10 months ago
5 Compelling Reasons to Hire an Eco-Friendly Contractor