Only one scientific paper out of 2,258 published in 2013 contested man’s contribution to climate change, according to new research by a US academic.
Dr James Powell analysed articles from between November 2012 and December 2013. He found that just 0.04% of papers disagreed with the scientific consensus that says manmade greenhouse gas emissions are contributing to the increase in global average temperatures.
Powell did the same research for 2012, analysing 13,950 articles published between 1991 and 2012. He found out that only 24 rejected the idea that human activity played a key role in global warming. He said this proved that the idea that there was no consensus on the issue among climate scientists was incorrect.
Powell, who is a retired geology professor, a former college and museum president and member of the National Science Board for 12 years, decided to update his results after reviewing papers published in 2013.
He analysed 2,258 peer-reviewed articles, written by 9,136 authors, of which only one in the Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences rejected manmade global warming.
The denying article is called The Role of Solar Activity in Global Warming, by SV Avakyan, a Russian author who argued that solar geomagnetic activity on clouds was the main responsible for carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions increase.
Powell noted that Avakyan wrote in the paper, “The switch of world powers first to decreasing the use of fossil fuel and then to carbon-free energy within the framework of the Kyoto Protocol may lead to economic collapse for Russia as a consequence of the reduction and, probably, even loss of the possibility to sell oil and natural gas on the world market.”
In May last year, Skeptical Science surveyed thousands of scientific papers and found that almost all of them – 97% – agreed that global warming was primarily manmade.
The anonymous billionaire group funding climate change denial
97% of scientists agree that climate change is human-caused
How online ‘filter bubbles’ can reinforce climate scepticism
Why climate deniers have no scientific credibility – in one pie chart
Like our Facebook Page
The Pros and Cons of Fixed Prices for Sustainable Energy
How to Plan an Unforgettable Eco-Friendly Trip to Europe
Is Decarbonizing The Shipping Industry an Achievable Goal?
Designing Eco-Systems Sustainable Exhibits: Strategies for Reducing Environmental Impact
Green Living, Education and Awareness Are Keys to Preventing Mesothelioma
Canada Can Take New Steps to Make Healthcare Greener
Roy Bartholomew Shares Basics of Ecosystem Engineering
Understanding the Evolving Science of Environmental Health
Is Eco-Friendly Composite Decking Really Good for the Planet?
Eco-Friendly Composting Tips that All Gardeneners Should Follow
6 Home Improvements You Can Make to Help the Environment
Reduce, Reuse, Recycle: Eco-Friendly Party Favors Made for the Garden
Humane Pigeons Pest Control Tips Environmentalists Can Follow
Environmental Impact of Artificial Grass for Your Lawn
Choosing The Best Eco-Friendly Furniture Set for your Living Room
How to Travel More Sustainably While Saving Money
Planning an Eco-Friendly Bus Trip to Singapore with Friends
The Truth About The Environmental Impact of Dogs
6 Major Luxury Residential Projects Responding to Climate Change
Essential Findings to Include in Your Research Paper on Air Pollution
- Energy11 months ago
How To Choose the Right Solar Inverter for Your Home?
- Energy11 months ago
How to Choose the Best Solar Panel for Your Home
- Environment11 months ago
Reduce Industry Footprints with Sustainable Material Swaps
- Environment10 months ago
Is Smart Building Technology the Future of Sustainability?