Campaigners Criticise Decision To Renew BP Sponsorship Of Iconic Cultural Institutions

25
London Buses on Whitehall by DncnH via Flickr

Campaigners vow to challenge and overturn decision by British Museum, National Portrait Gallery, Royal Opera House and Royal Shakespeare Company to sign new £7.5 million 5-year BP sponsorship deal

 

 

Dr Chris Garrard, speaking on behalf of BP or not BP? said: ‘This will be a hugely unpopular move and wildly out of touch with the mood across the cultural sector. Just weeks ago, BP’s corrupting influence over these cultural institutions was exposed in a damning report, uncovering the way the company uses sponsorship to keep drilling, spilling and costing up to corrupt regimes.

‘To make this decision at a time when the Museums Association is considering whether its Code of Ethics has been breached shows that the commitment of these institutions to ethics and sustainability is not worth the paper it’s written on.

‘At a time when the world needs to urgently shift away from fossil fuels, the idea that these institutions will still be promoting an oil company into the 2020s is deeply irresponsible. As the devastating effects of climate change become ever more apparent, this decision will look more shortsighted with every passing day. It is also a kick in the teeth to everyone dealing with the negative consequences of BP’s operations around the world.

‘In making this decision, these cultural institutions are going against the wishes of the people of London [1], large numbers of their own workers [2], and many respected cultural figures, scientists and academics.

‘Sponsorship deals have been cancelled in the past due to public pressure. BP or not BP? intend to do everything we can to overturn this decision, and call on the cultural world to condemn it creatively and vocally.’

‘BP or not BP?’ is an activist theatre troupe who have campaigned against BP’s sponsorship of arts and culture since 2012, beginning with stage-invading Shakespearean protests at the RSC and have held 18 performance protests inside the British Museum. They are part of the Art Not Oil coalition, who published an extensive report into BP’s ‘corrupting influence’ over the institutions it sponsors which is currently being considered by the Museums Association’s Ethics Committee.

Art Not Oil’s report ‘BP’s Cultural Sponsorship: A Corrupting Influence’, is available at:

http://www.artnotoil.org.uk/blog/bp%E2%80%99s-corrupting-influence

A letter signed by almost 100 cultural figures, scientists and academics calling on Hartwig Fischer to end BP’s deal with the British Museum was published in April here:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/apr/03/british-museum-bp-sponsorship-hartwig-fischer-climate

BP or not BP?

www.bp-or-not-bp.org

Art Not Oil

www.artnotoil.org.uk

 
[1] A recent poll found that more Londoners wanted the British Museum to end rather than keep BP sponsorship, by a significant margin:http://platformlondon.org/2016/04/06/british-museum-drop-bp-poll-edinburgh-festival

[2] A March 2016 survey of staff at the British Museum by the PCS Union found that two-thirds of staff believed the museum should drop BP:http://europe.newsweek.com/british-museum-urged-drop-partnership-bp-443629?rm=eu